Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively Described
20031.0k citationsF Richard, Charles F. Bond et al.Review of General Psychologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of F Richard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F Richard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F Richard more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F Richard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F Richard. The network helps show where F Richard may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F Richard
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F Richard.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F Richard based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with F Richard. F Richard is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kramer, Robin S. S., et al.. (2014). Training with Action-Video Games and Attentional Resources: Effect of Video Game Playing on a Flanker Task.3 indexed citations
Williams, Jennifer, C. Dominik Güss, & F Richard. (2007). The Memory Retrieval Debate Revisited: Is it Spreading Activation or Compound-Cue?. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 29(29).1 indexed citations
12.
Güss, C. Dominik, et al.. (2004). Task Complexity and Difficulty in Two Computer-Simulated Problems: Cross-cultural Similarities and Differences. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 26(26).2 indexed citations
13.
Bond, Charles F., Wyndy L. Wiitala, & F Richard. (2003). Meta-Analysis of Raw Mean Differences.. Psychological Methods. 8(4). 406–418.86 indexed citations
14.
Richard, F, et al.. (2003). One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively Described. Review of General Psychology. 7(4). 331–363.1041 indexed citations breakdown →
Richard, F, et al.. (2000). A Chance To Go Full Circle: Building on Reforms To Create Effective Learning..2 indexed citations
17.
Richard, F, et al.. (1996). Some Recent Developments in Canadian Constitutional Theory with Particular Reference to Beatty and Hutchinson.2 indexed citations
18.
Richard, F, et al.. (1996). Book Review of Contracts: Cases and Commentaries.1 indexed citations
19.
Richard, F, et al.. (1996). Judging and Diversity: Justice or just us?.1 indexed citations
20.
Richard, F, et al.. (1993). Solidarity or Solipsistic Tunnel Vision? Reminiscences of a Renegade Rapporteur.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.