This map shows the geographic impact of F Olivero's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F Olivero with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F Olivero more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F Olivero. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F Olivero. The network helps show where F Olivero may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F Olivero
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F Olivero.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F Olivero based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with F Olivero. F Olivero is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Olivero, F, et al.. (2013). Participatory professional development: ICT and mathematics education in Rwanda. Explore Bristol Research.1 indexed citations
2.
Olivero, F, et al.. (2009). Learning and technology. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 46–96.4 indexed citations
3.
Olivero, F, et al.. (2007). Teaching and Learning Principles into Practice. Explore Bristol Research.
4.
Olivero, F, et al.. (2007). Using Videopapers for Professional Learning and Assessment in Initial Teacher Education. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).2 indexed citations
5.
Olivero, F, et al.. (2007). Videopaper: bridging research and practice for pre-service and experienced teachers. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 479–493.20 indexed citations
6.
Olivero, F. (2005). Computer Assisted Learning conference.1 indexed citations
7.
Sutherland, Rosamund, et al.. (2004). Orchestrating Mathematical Proof through the Use of Digital Tools.. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 2004(1). 265–272.2 indexed citations
Olivero, F. (2003). Cabri as a shared workspace within the proving process.. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).2 indexed citations
10.
Sutherland, RJ, et al.. (2003). Tools for learning.9 indexed citations
Arzarello, Ferdinando, et al.. (2002). An exploratory study of students' measurement activity in a dynamic geometry environment. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 215–226.4 indexed citations
Olivero, F. (2001). Research in Mathematics Education.11 indexed citations
15.
Olivero, F. (2001). Proceedings of PME25, Utrecht, The Netherlands.1 indexed citations
16.
Olivero, F & Rosamund Sutherland. (2000). THE CHURCHILL CABRI PROJECT: BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 67–72.1 indexed citations
17.
Olivero, F & Rosamund Sutherland. (2000). Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning in Mathematics.87 indexed citations
18.
Furinghetti, Fulvia, et al.. (1999). Watching video-recorded sessions as a support in the construction of a shared classroom culture. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 369–373.
19.
Olivero, F. (1999). Cabri-géomètre as a mediator in the process of transition to proofs in open geometric situations.. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).6 indexed citations
20.
Olivero, F, et al.. (1999). Designing Dynamic Geometry Tasks that Support the Proving Process. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.