Tracy Kwang

6 papers receiving 8.2k citations

Hit Papers

Amazon's Mechanical Turk 2011 · 8.3k citations
8.3k0+5+10Years since publication2.5k5.0k7.5k

Peers

Tracy Kwang
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
  • Applied Psychology 1.1k
  • General Decision Sciences 279
  • Social Psychology 2.4k
  • Marketing 904
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.2k
Replace Michael D. Buhrmester with:
Michael D. Buhrmester United Kingdom
Jesse Chandler United States
Gabriele Paolacci Netherlands
Peter J. Rentfrow United Kingdom
W. David Pierce Canada
Michał Kosiński United Kingdom
Sanjay Srivastava United States
David Stillwell United Kingdom
Justin Kruger United States
Wolfgang Stroebe Netherlands
Tracy Kwang relative to Michael D. Buhrmester United Kingdom Michael D. Buhrmester's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michael D. Buhrmester · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tracy Kwang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tracy Kwang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tracy Kwang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tracy Kwang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tracy Kwang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tracy Kwang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tracy Kwang. The network helps show where Tracy Kwang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Tracy Kwang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tracy Kwang Line = papers co-authored together Tracy Kwang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

About Tracy Kwang

Tracy Kwang is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Marketing, having authored 6 papers that have together received 8.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (1.1k citations), General Decision Sciences (279 citations), Social Psychology (2.4k citations), Marketing (904 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.2k citations). Tracy Kwang has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Michael D. Buhrmester, Samuel D. Gosling, William B. Swann, Diana T. Sanchez, Erin E. Crockett, John E. McGeary, Christopher G. Beevers, Tony T. Wells, Jessica J. Good and E. S. Saltzman. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Social Psychology Review, Perspectives on Psychological Science, Psychology of Women Quarterly, Depression and Anxiety and Psychological Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact