Erin M. Harley

789 total citations
21 papers, 549 citations indexed

About

Erin M. Harley is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Erin M. Harley has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 549 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 6 papers in Social Psychology and 5 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Erin M. Harley's work include Face Recognition and Perception (5 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers). Erin M. Harley is often cited by papers focused on Face Recognition and Perception (5 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers). Erin M. Harley collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Erin M. Harley's co-authors include Geoffrey R. Loftus, Daniel M. Bernstein, Stephen A. Engel, Dieter R. Enzmann, Whitney B. Pope, J. Pablo Villablanca, John C. Mazziotta, Jeanette A. Mumford, Irving S. Scher and Susan K. Gilmour and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, NeuroImage and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

In The Last Decade

Erin M. Harley

20 papers receiving 528 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Erin M. Harley United States 11 344 90 88 79 61 21 549
Melina A. Kunar United Kingdom 20 781 2.3× 204 2.3× 212 2.4× 59 0.7× 17 0.3× 49 1.1k
Robert Gaschler Germany 14 163 0.5× 106 1.2× 95 1.1× 18 0.2× 107 1.8× 68 528
Nick Perham United Kingdom 15 340 1.0× 131 1.5× 119 1.4× 83 1.1× 35 0.6× 36 626
Daniel Hausmann Switzerland 9 105 0.3× 74 0.8× 31 0.4× 101 1.3× 45 0.7× 12 447
Justin Kantner United States 11 307 0.9× 100 1.1× 110 1.3× 26 0.3× 104 1.7× 31 471
Dario Bombari Switzerland 11 222 0.6× 168 1.9× 139 1.6× 6 0.1× 99 1.6× 13 531
Nancy K. Steblay United States 12 667 1.9× 62 0.7× 587 6.7× 24 0.3× 125 2.0× 24 867
Elisabet Tubau Spain 11 182 0.5× 53 0.6× 55 0.6× 144 1.8× 41 0.7× 28 410
Jennifer E. Dysart United States 14 700 2.0× 73 0.8× 587 6.7× 15 0.2× 99 1.6× 24 827
Steve D. Charman United States 13 357 1.0× 45 0.5× 301 3.4× 20 0.3× 59 1.0× 29 449

Countries citing papers authored by Erin M. Harley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erin M. Harley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erin M. Harley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erin M. Harley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erin M. Harley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erin M. Harley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erin M. Harley. The network helps show where Erin M. Harley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erin M. Harley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erin M. Harley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erin M. Harley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erin M. Harley. Erin M. Harley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Harley, Erin M., et al.. (2023). Factors that influence chairlift restraint bar use in the United States. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 100031–100031. 1 indexed citations
2.
Harley, Erin M., et al.. (2020). An observational study of skier compliance with posted “slow” signs and ski patrollers. Journal of science and medicine in sport. 24(10). 1061–1066. 2 indexed citations
3.
Harley, Erin M., et al.. (2016). Hindsight Bias and Law. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. 224(3). 190–203. 19 indexed citations
4.
Kim, Robyn, et al.. (2015). Store-Related Injuries to Children and Adults. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 59(1). 1457–1461. 1 indexed citations
5.
Harley, Erin M., et al.. (2010). Reaction Times of Skiers and Snowboarders. Journal of ASTM International. 7(9). 1–7. 10 indexed citations
6.
Shealy, Jasper E., et al.. (2010). Jumper Kinematics on Terrain Park Jumps: Relationship between Takeoff Speed and Distance Traveled. Journal of ASTM International. 7(10). 1–10. 7 indexed citations
7.
Harley, Erin M., et al.. (2010). Helmet Use in Sledding: Do Users Comply with Manufacturer Warnings?. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 54(10). 733–737. 5 indexed citations
8.
Scher, Irving S., et al.. (2009). Likelihood of Brain Injury in Motorcycle Accidents: A Comparison of Novelty and DOT-Approved Helmets. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1. 4 indexed citations
9.
Harley, Erin M., Whitney B. Pope, J. Pablo Villablanca, et al.. (2009). Engagement of Fusiform Cortex and Disengagement of Lateral Occipital Cortex in the Acquisition of Radiological Expertise. Cerebral Cortex. 19(11). 2746–2754. 77 indexed citations
10.
Harley, Erin M., et al.. (2008). Driver Gear-Shifting Behaviors and Errors. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 52(23). 1898–1902. 2 indexed citations
11.
Bernstein, Daniel M. & Erin M. Harley. (2007). Fluency misattribution and visual hindsight bias. Memory. 15(5). 548–560. 21 indexed citations
12.
Huntley‐Fenner, Gavin, et al.. (2007). ANSI Z535.6 and Conspicuity: A Test of the New State of the Art Format for Instructions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 51(17). 1029–1033. 4 indexed citations
13.
Harley, Erin M.. (2007). Hindsight Bias In Legal Decision Making. Social Cognition. 25(1). 48–63. 81 indexed citations
14.
Bouvier, Seth, et al.. (2006). Nonlinearities in rapid event-related fMRI explained by stimulus scaling. NeuroImage. 34(2). 651–660. 21 indexed citations
15.
Loftus, Geoffrey R. & Erin M. Harley. (2005). Why is it easier to identify someone close than far away?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 12(1). 43–65. 113 indexed citations
16.
Loftus, Geoffrey R. & Erin M. Harley. (2004). How Different Spatial-Frequency Components Contribute to Visual Information Acquisition.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 30(1). 104–118. 47 indexed citations
17.
Harley, Erin M., et al.. (2004). Why is it difficult to see in the fog? How stimulus contrast affects visual perception and visual memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 11(2). 197–231. 23 indexed citations
18.
Harley, Erin M., et al.. (2004). The "Saw-It-All-Along" Effect: Demonstrations of Visual Hindsight Bias.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 30(5). 960–968. 80 indexed citations
19.
Harley, Erin M. & Geoffrey R. Loftus. (2000). MATLAB and graphical user interfaces: Tools for experimental management. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 32(2). 290–296. 9 indexed citations
20.
Bryans, Margaret, Erin M. Harley, & Susan K. Gilmour. (1996). Elevated Cellular Polyamine Levels Enhance Promoter Activityin Vivo. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 226(3). 618–625. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026