Erin M. Harley
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Geoffrey R. LoftusDaniel M. BernsteinStephen A. EngelWhitney B. PopeJ. Pablo VillablancaJohn C. MazziottaDieter R. EnzmannJeanette A. Mumford
- Topics
- Face Recognition and Perception (5 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNeuroImageBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Erin M. Harley
20 papers receiving 528 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Cognitive Neuroscience 344
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 90
- Social Psychology 88
- General Decision Sciences 79
- Sociology and Political Science 61
Countries citing papers authored by Erin M. Harley
This map shows the geographic impact of Erin M. Harley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erin M. Harley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erin M. Harley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Erin M. Harley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erin M. Harley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erin M. Harley. The network helps show where Erin M. Harley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erin M. Harley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erin M. Harley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erin M. Harley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erin M. Harley. Erin M. Harley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 77 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 81 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 113 | |
| 16 | 47 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 80 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About Erin M. Harley
Erin M. Harley is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Cognitive Neuroscience and Family Practice, having authored 21 papers that have together received 549 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (5 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (79 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (344 citations) and Family Practice (24 citations). Erin M. Harley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Geoffrey R. Loftus, Daniel M. Bernstein, Stephen A. Engel, Whitney B. Pope, J. Pablo Villablanca, John C. Mazziotta, Dieter R. Enzmann, Jeanette A. Mumford, Irving S. Scher and Margaret Bryans. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, NeuroImage and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.