Lena Nadarevic
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Edgar ErdfelderAndré AßfalgBenjamin E. HilbigMorten MoshagenRolf ReberDirk KranzJeffrey N. RouderJochen Musch
- Topics
- Memory Processes and Influences (8 papers)Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 papers)Deception detection and forensic psychology (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaCognitionJournal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
- Partner nations
- GermanyCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Lena Nadarevic
19 papers receiving 503 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Cognitive Neuroscience 293
- Sociology and Political Science 203
- Social Psychology 106
- Artificial Intelligence 105
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 92
Countries citing papers authored by Lena Nadarevic
This map shows the geographic impact of Lena Nadarevic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lena Nadarevic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lena Nadarevic more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lena Nadarevic
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lena Nadarevic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lena Nadarevic. The network helps show where Lena Nadarevic may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lena Nadarevic
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lena Nadarevic. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lena Nadarevic based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lena Nadarevic. Lena Nadarevic is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 60 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 263 |
About Lena Nadarevic
Lena Nadarevic is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 520 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (8 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (85 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (293 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (92 citations). Lena Nadarevic has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Edgar Erdfelder, André Aßfalg, Benjamin E. Hilbig, Morten Moshagen, Rolf Reber, Dirk Kranz, Jeffrey N. Rouder, Jochen Musch, Meike Kroneisen and Isabel Thielmann. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Cognition and Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.