Erik Garrett

407 total citations
10 papers, 283 citations indexed

About

Erik Garrett is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Erik Garrett has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 283 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Social Psychology, 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Erik Garrett's work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (3 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers). Erik Garrett is often cited by papers focused on Human-Animal Interaction Studies (3 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers). Erik Garrett collaborates with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Erik Garrett's co-authors include Peter H. Kahn, Alan M. Beck, Batya Friedman, Gail F. Melson, Carol D. Saunders, Brian T. Gill, Olin Eugene Myers, Jessica Thompson, James G. Cantrill and Jill A. Hoffman and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Environmental Education Research and Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

In The Last Decade

Erik Garrett

9 papers receiving 251 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Erik Garrett United States	5	187	76	55	53	51	10	283
Deanne R. Pérez-Granados United States	7	178 1.0×	44 0.6×	68 1.2×	64 1.2×	142 2.8×	12	357
Kathryn Y. Segovia United States	5	132 0.7×	13 0.2×	66 1.2×	50 0.9×	28 0.5×	8	350
佳世子稲垣	3	123 0.7×	22 0.3×	46 0.8×	11 0.2×	186 3.6×	3	304
Florencia K. Anggoro United States	9	73 0.4×	9 0.1×	26 0.5×	23 0.4×	168 3.3×	24	346
Gretchen A. Van de Walle United States	9	115 0.6×	22 0.3×	75 1.4×	9 0.2×	224 4.4×	11	388
Stuart Gray United Kingdom	9	49 0.3×	32 0.4×	75 1.4×	18 0.3×	62 1.2×	23	366
Sari R. R. Nijssen Netherlands	8	187 1.0×	8 0.1×	145 2.6×	54 1.0×	38 0.7×	14	291
Stacy M. Lopresti‐Goodman United States	11	187 1.0×	32 0.4×	228 4.1×	16 0.3×	30 0.6×	16	369
Stefano Gualeni Malta	9	50 0.3×	64 0.8×	16 0.3×	34 0.6×	42 0.8×	42	276
Paul Chance United States	9	51 0.3×	17 0.2×	45 0.8×	5 0.1×	119 2.3×	14	276

Countries citing papers authored by Erik Garrett

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erik Garrett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erik Garrett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erik Garrett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erik Garrett

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erik Garrett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erik Garrett. The network helps show where Erik Garrett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erik Garrett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erik Garrett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erik Garrett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erik Garrett. Erik Garrett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Garrett, Erik, et al.. (2021). Strangeness of the Strange. 13. 77–90.

2.

Garrett, Erik, et al.. (2021). Mindful Eating and Perceived Stress in College Students. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 121(9). A94–A94. 2 indexed citations

3.

Garrett, Erik. (2019). Digiphrenia and the divided technological self: A critical mapping of modern technological diachronic time. Explorations in Media Ecology. 18(3). 235–247. 2 indexed citations

4.

Garrett, Erik. (2011). The Rhetoric of Antiblack Racism: Lewis R. Gordon's Radical Phenomenology of Embodiment. Atlantic Journal of Communication. 19(1). 6–16. 3 indexed citations

5.

Melson, Gail F., Peter H. Kahn, Alan M. Beck, et al.. (2008). Children's behavior toward and understanding of robotic and living dogs. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 30(2). 92–102. 107 indexed citations

6.

Cantrill, James G., et al.. (2007). Exploring a Sense of Self-in-Place to Explain the Impulse for Urban Sprawl. Environmental Communication. 1(2). 123–145. 11 indexed citations

7.

Garrett, Erik. (2007). A phenomenological investigation of the child -animal bond. Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System). 2 indexed citations

8.

Melson, Gail F., et al.. (2005). Robots as dogs?. 1649–1652. 85 indexed citations

9.

Saunders, Carol D., et al.. (2004). What do children think animals need? Developmental trends. Environmental Education Research. 10(4). 545–562. 42 indexed citations

10.

Myers, Olin Eugene, Carol D. Saunders, & Erik Garrett. (2003). What Do Children Think Animals Need? Aesthetic and Psycho-social Conceptions. Environmental Education Research. 9(3). 305–325. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact