This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Hansen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Hansen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Hansen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Hansen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Hansen. The network helps show where Eric Hansen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eric Hansen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eric Hansen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eric Hansen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Eric Hansen. Eric Hansen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hansen, Alexandria K., et al.. (2021). Making Computer Science Accessible.. Science and Children. 58(5). 80–85.1 indexed citations
3.
Hansen, Eric, Hans Fredrik Hoen, & Erlend Nybakk. (2018). Competitive Advantage for the Forest-based Sector in the Future Bioeconomy – research question priority. 15–28.1 indexed citations
4.
Muszyński, Lech, et al.. (2017). Insights into the Global Cross-Laminated Timber Industry. 77–92.34 indexed citations
5.
Hansen, Eric, et al.. (2016). Marketing organization and implementation in private U.S. sawmilling companies. 1–13.6 indexed citations
6.
Nybakk, Erlend, et al.. (2015). Chemical Suppliers’ Perspectives and Impact on Innovation in the Wood Treating Industry. Wood and Fiber Science. 47(1). 31–43.1 indexed citations
Wang, Lei, et al.. (2010). Students' Perceptions of Forest Industries Business Ethics - A Comparative Analysis of Finland and the USA. Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä).9 indexed citations
Panwar, Rajat & Eric Hansen. (2009). A Process for Identifying Social and Environmental Issues: A Case of the US Forest Products Manufacturing Industry. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
11.
Hansen, Eric, et al.. (2008). A multisite field study of lean thinking in U.S. and German secondary wood products manufacturers.. Forest Products Journal. 58(9). 77–85.31 indexed citations
12.
Hansen, Eric, et al.. (2008). Post-fire assessments, methodology, and equations for directly determining wood's residual flexural properties. Forest Products Journal. 58(5). 40–46.23 indexed citations
13.
Panwar, Rajat & Eric Hansen. (2008). La responsabilidad social de la empresa en el sector forestal. 59(230). 45–48.1 indexed citations
14.
Hansen, Eric. (2008). Methods For Interval Linear Equations.1 indexed citations
15.
Anderson, Roy C., et al.. (2005). Current consumer behavior research in forest products.. Forest Products Journal. 55(1). 21–27.15 indexed citations
16.
Hansen, Eric, et al.. (2004). Innovativeness in the forest products industry.. Forest Products Journal. 54(1). 26–33.68 indexed citations
Anderson, Roy C., Eric Hansen, & Jeffrey J. Morrell. (2002). Use of anti-stain chemical treatments by the western U.S. softwood lumber industry, 1999. USC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast).1 indexed citations
19.
Hansen, Eric, et al.. (1999). Developing markets for certified forest products : A case study of Collins Pine Company. Forest Products Journal. 49(1). 30–35.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.