Emorcia V. Hill

448 total citations
9 papers, 306 citations indexed

About

Emorcia V. Hill is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emorcia V. Hill has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 306 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Gender Studies, 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Emorcia V. Hill's work include Diversity and Career in Medicine (8 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (5 papers) and Mentoring and Academic Development (3 papers). Emorcia V. Hill is often cited by papers focused on Diversity and Career in Medicine (8 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (5 papers) and Mentoring and Academic Development (3 papers). Emorcia V. Hill collaborates with scholars based in United States and Slovenia. Emorcia V. Hill's co-authors include Joan Y. Reede, Erica T. Warner, Griffin M. Weber, Caitlin M. McCracken, Rowena Ortiz‐Walters, Brigette A. Davis, David R. Williams, Jourdyn A. Lawrence, Linda H. Chaudron and Vincent D. Pellegrini and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of General Internal Medicine and Academic Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Emorcia V. Hill

8 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emorcia V. Hill United States	8	218	180	101	70	38	9	306
Ann Steinecke United States	7	104 0.5×	169 0.9×	62 0.6×	56 0.8×	35 0.9×	14	268
Marin Gillis United States	5	191 0.9×	159 0.9×	98 1.0×	26 0.4×	35 0.9×	9	266
Katherine A. Hill United States	7	187 0.9×	166 0.9×	104 1.0×	35 0.5×	54 1.4×	13	278
Valerie Dandar United States	10	150 0.7×	178 1.0×	92 0.9×	57 0.8×	25 0.7×	23	261
Rosalyn C. Richman United States	9	295 1.4×	298 1.7×	81 0.8×	167 2.4×	47 1.2×	11	428
Katherine Ripullone United Kingdom	7	87 0.4×	75 0.4×	45 0.4×	19 0.3×	5 0.1×	10	223
Diana Lautenberger United States	7	296 1.4×	198 1.1×	104 1.0×	31 0.4×	50 1.3×	9	320
Michelle Vermillion United States	7	96 0.4×	161 0.9×	150 1.5×	26 0.4×	17 0.4×	8	296
Candace J. Chow United States	9	81 0.4×	179 1.0×	75 0.7×	20 0.3×	36 0.9×	32	275
Fran Cousans United Kingdom	7	237 1.1×	428 2.4×	68 0.7×	12 0.2×	67 1.8×	8	482

Countries citing papers authored by Emorcia V. Hill

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emorcia V. Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emorcia V. Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emorcia V. Hill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emorcia V. Hill

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emorcia V. Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emorcia V. Hill. The network helps show where Emorcia V. Hill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emorcia V. Hill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emorcia V. Hill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emorcia V. Hill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emorcia V. Hill. Emorcia V. Hill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Louis, Jessica St., et al.. (2024). Medical student diversity and the importance of advocacy in choice of career path. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1).

Lawrence, Jourdyn A., et al.. (2021). Racial/Ethnic Differences in Burnout: a Systematic Review. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 9(1). 257–269. 67 indexed citations

Periyakoil, Vyjeyanthi S., Linda H. Chaudron, Emorcia V. Hill, et al.. (2019). Common Types of Gender-Based Microaggressions in Medicine. Academic Medicine. 95(3). 450–457. 62 indexed citations

Warner, Erica T., et al.. (2017). Gender Differences in Receipt of National Institutes of Health R01 Grants Among Junior Faculty at an Academic Medical Center: The Role of Connectivity, Rank, and Research Productivity. Journal of Women s Health. 26(10). 1086–1093. 21 indexed citations

McCracken, Caitlin M., et al.. (2017). Organizational Context and Female Faculty's Perception of the Climate for Women in Academic Medicine. Journal of Women s Health. 26(5). 549–559. 19 indexed citations

Hill, Emorcia V., Michael J. C. Wake, Sharon‐Lise T. Normand, et al.. (2016). Rationale and Design of the Women and Inclusion in Academic Medicine Study. Ethnicity & Disease. 26(2). 245–245. 10 indexed citations

Ortiz‐Walters, Rowena, et al.. (2016). Variability in Women Faculty’s Preferences Regarding Mentor Similarity: A Multi-Institution Study in Academic Medicine. Academic Medicine. 91(8). 1108–1118. 54 indexed citations

Warner, Erica T., et al.. (2015). Faculty Promotion and Attrition: The Importance of Coauthor Network Reach at an Academic Medical Center. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 31(1). 60–67. 56 indexed citations

Warner, Erica T., et al.. (2015). Considering Context in Academic Medicine. Academic Medicine. 90(8). 1077–1083. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact