emma sleath

1.2k total citations
25 papers, 812 citations indexed

About

emma sleath is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, emma sleath has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 812 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 14 papers in Health and 14 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in emma sleath's work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (13 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (12 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers) emma sleath is often cited by papers focused on Intimate Partner and Family Violence (13 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (12 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers) emma sleath collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia emma sleath's co-authors include Ray Bull, Kate Walker, Sarah Brown, Chérie Armour, Erica Bowen, Ruth M. Hatcher, Lisa L. Smith, Benjamin A. Hine, Adrian J. Scott and Carlo Tramontano and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Interpersonal Violence and Aggression and Violent Behavior.

In The Last Decade

emma sleath

23 papers receiving 781 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
emma sleath United Kingdom 13 579 440 268 240 78 25 812
Benjamin A. Hine United Kingdom 12 347 0.6× 220 0.5× 209 0.8× 79 0.3× 37 0.5× 29 480
Fiona Vera‐Gray United Kingdom 11 309 0.5× 282 0.6× 110 0.4× 108 0.5× 27 0.3× 14 470
Anne‐Marie McAlinden United Kingdom 13 196 0.3× 496 1.1× 92 0.3× 441 1.8× 33 0.4× 43 673
Kathryn A. Branch United States 12 242 0.4× 247 0.6× 205 0.8× 119 0.5× 8 0.1× 22 490
Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner United States 12 220 0.4× 406 0.9× 478 1.8× 182 0.8× 24 0.3× 28 631
Victoria L. Banyard United States 13 953 1.6× 594 1.4× 616 2.3× 89 0.4× 12 0.2× 15 1.1k
Brendan Lantz United States 17 83 0.1× 636 1.4× 77 0.3× 137 0.6× 109 1.4× 46 704
Katrin Mueller‐Johnson United Kingdom 14 151 0.3× 153 0.3× 52 0.2× 96 0.4× 46 0.6× 33 391
Alayne J. Ormerod United States 11 507 0.9× 310 0.7× 120 0.4× 87 0.4× 15 0.2× 17 645
Jennifer Lynne Holmes United States 5 431 0.7× 325 0.7× 260 1.0× 102 0.4× 8 0.1× 6 568

Countries citing papers authored by emma sleath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of emma sleath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by emma sleath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites emma sleath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by emma sleath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by emma sleath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by emma sleath. The network helps show where emma sleath may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of emma sleath

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of emma sleath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of emma sleath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with emma sleath. emma sleath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
O’Doherty, Lorna, et al.. (2024). ‘It's the judicial equivalent of robbing Peter to pay Paul’—The implementation gap in section 28 Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof. 29(2). 117–139. 1 indexed citations
2.
O’Doherty, Lorna, G. Carter, emma sleath, et al.. (2024). Health and wellbeing of survivors of sexual violence and abuse attending sexual assault referral centres in England: the MESARCH mixed-methods evaluation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12(35). 1–133. 1 indexed citations
3.
Walker, Kate, et al.. (2024). Breaking the Silence: Addressing Domestic Abuse in Mental Health Settings—Identification, Screening, and Responding. Trauma Violence & Abuse. 26(3). 436–450. 1 indexed citations
5.
sleath, emma & Ray Bull. (2017). Police perceptions of rape victims and the impact on case decision making: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 34. 102–112. 122 indexed citations
6.
sleath, emma, Kate Walker, & Carlo Tramontano. (2017). Factor Structure and Validation of the Controlling Behaviors Scale–Revised and Revised Conflict Tactics Scale. Journal of Family Issues. 39(7). 1880–1903. 10 indexed citations
7.
Walker, Kate & emma sleath. (2017). A systematic review of the current knowledge regarding revenge pornography and non-consensual sharing of sexually explicit media. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 36. 9–24. 152 indexed citations
9.
sleath, emma & Lisa L. Smith. (2016). Understanding the factors that predict victim retraction in police reported allegations of intimate partner violence.. Psychology of Violence. 7(1). 140–149. 19 indexed citations
10.
Walker, Kate, Erica Bowen, Sarah Brown, & emma sleath. (2015). An Examination of Psychopathology Among Men who have Suspended the Use of Violence in Their Intimate Relationships. Journal of Family Violence. 30(5). 539–554. 8 indexed citations
11.
Walker, Kate, Erica Bowen, Sarah Brown, & emma sleath. (2015). Subjective Accounts of the Turning Points that Facilitate Desistance From Intimate Partner Violence. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 61(4). 371–396. 10 indexed citations
12.
sleath, emma & Ray Bull. (2015). A Brief Report on Rape Myth Acceptance: Differences Between Police Officers, Law Students, and Psychology Students in the United Kingdom. Violence and Victims. 30(1). 136–147. 44 indexed citations
13.
Walker, Kate, Erica Bowen, Sarah Brown, & emma sleath. (2014). Desistance From Intimate Partner Violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 30(15). 2726–2750. 27 indexed citations
14.
Armour, Chérie & emma sleath. (2014). Assessing the co-occurrence of intimate partner violence domains across the life-course: relating typologies to mental health. European journal of psychotraumatology. 5(1). 29 indexed citations
15.
sleath, emma & Jessica Woodhams. (2014). Expectations about victim and offender behaviour during stranger rape. Psychology Crime and Law. 20(8). 798–820. 13 indexed citations
16.
Scott, Adrian J., Jeff Gavin, emma sleath, & Lorraine Sheridan. (2013). The attribution of responsibility in cases of stalking. Psychology Crime and Law. 20(7). 705–721. 8 indexed citations
17.
Scott, Adrian J., et al.. (2013). International Perceptions of Stalking and Responsibility. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 41(2). 220–236. 23 indexed citations
18.
sleath, emma & Ray Bull. (2012). Comparing Rape Victim and Perpetrator Blaming in a Police Officer Sample. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 39(5). 646–665. 135 indexed citations
19.
Flowe, Heather D., et al.. (2011). Public house patrons' engagement in hypothetical sexual assault: a test of Alcohol Myopia Theory in a field setting. Aggressive Behavior. 37(6). 547–558. 22 indexed citations
20.
sleath, emma & Ray Bull. (2009). Male Rape Victim and Perpetrator Blaming. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 25(6). 969–988. 93 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026