Robert E. Parker

575 citations
22 papers · 386 indexed · h-index 10

Robert E. Parker

17 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers

Robert E. Parker
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Urban Studies 46
  • Geography, Planning and Development 38
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 6
  • Demography 37
  • Sociology and Political Science 128
Replace Jonathan Everts with:
Jonathan Everts Germany
Laura Jones United Kingdom
Peter J. Brown United Kingdom
Yifan Zuo China
Ton van Naerssen Netherlands
Kim Humphery Australia
Kevin McCracken Australia
Masao Miyoshi Japan
Dean Wilson Australia
Krishnendu Ray United States
Robert E. Parker relative to Jonathan Everts Germany Jonathan Everts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Jonathan Everts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Parker. The network helps show where Robert E. Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Parker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Parker Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Parker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201722
2 201711
3 201721
4 20170
5 201644
6 201319
7
Salem Target Industry Analysis
20100
8 20020
9 199934
10 19971
11 199711
12 1995175
13 19952
14 199211
15 19929
16 19922
17 19900
18 19814
19
Behaviour of seed cotton exposed to certain atmospheric conditions.
19670
20 19641

About Robert E. Parker

Robert E. Parker is a scholar working on Pollution, Insect Science, Plant Science, General Health Professions and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 22 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (4 papers), Neonatal and Maternal Infections (4 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Research in Cotton Cultivation (2 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (2 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (2 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (2 papers) and Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (46 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (38 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (6 citations), Demography (37 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (128 citations). Robert E. Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Rob Shields, D. W. Livingstone, Shannon D. Manning, H. Dele Davies, Jennifer A. Gaddy, Ruth N. Zadoks, Kate Bronfenbrenner, Pallavi Singh, E. Patrick Fuerst and Kassim Al‐Khatib. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Social Forces, Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Industrial and Labor Relations Review and Weed Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026