Emma Kirkpatrick

558 total citations
10 papers, 358 citations indexed

About

Emma Kirkpatrick is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Kirkpatrick has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 358 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 3 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Emma Kirkpatrick's work include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (3 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers) and Occupational and environmental lung diseases (2 papers). Emma Kirkpatrick is often cited by papers focused on Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (3 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers) and Occupational and environmental lung diseases (2 papers). Emma Kirkpatrick collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Emma Kirkpatrick's co-authors include Claire F. Smith, Scott Border, Catherine Hennessy, Amanda Blatch-Jones, Anna Basu, P. W. James, J A Eyre, Doreen Tembo, Ignazio Puzzo and David Wright and has published in prestigious journals such as Experimental Brain Research, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

Emma Kirkpatrick

9 papers receiving 346 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma Kirkpatrick United Kingdom 9 88 60 54 51 45 10 358
Kristina Kelly United States 12 27 0.3× 59 1.0× 42 0.8× 26 0.5× 32 0.7× 18 426
Amin Nakhostin-Ansari Iran 11 59 0.7× 38 0.6× 107 2.0× 26 0.5× 58 1.3× 74 547
Mary Jean Walker Australia 15 45 0.5× 67 1.1× 87 1.6× 20 0.4× 18 0.4× 41 611
Yun-e Liu China 10 37 0.4× 30 0.5× 147 2.7× 44 0.9× 24 0.5× 18 517
Balasankar Ganesan Hong Kong 9 63 0.7× 37 0.6× 29 0.5× 16 0.3× 28 0.6× 23 414
Maciej Wilski Poland 14 65 0.7× 23 0.4× 55 1.0× 10 0.2× 68 1.5× 33 566
Marie Leiner United States 10 40 0.5× 43 0.7× 89 1.6× 30 0.6× 48 1.1× 37 402
Susanna Pardini Italy 15 59 0.7× 64 1.1× 61 1.1× 9 0.2× 73 1.6× 46 708
Karen Lok Yi Wong Canada 11 35 0.4× 95 1.6× 106 2.0× 44 0.9× 48 1.1× 58 353
Anneli Ozanne Sweden 14 120 1.4× 144 2.4× 83 1.5× 13 0.3× 19 0.4× 46 479

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Kirkpatrick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Kirkpatrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Kirkpatrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Kirkpatrick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Kirkpatrick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Kirkpatrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Kirkpatrick. The network helps show where Emma Kirkpatrick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Kirkpatrick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Kirkpatrick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Kirkpatrick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Kirkpatrick. Emma Kirkpatrick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
2.
Hanna, Gerard G., Gareth Griffiths, Emma Kirkpatrick, et al.. (2018). CONFIRM: a phase III randomised trial to evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab versus placebo in relapsed mesothelioma. Lung Cancer. 115. S84–S84.
4.
Blatch-Jones, Amanda, et al.. (2018). Role of feasibility and pilot studies in randomised controlled trials: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 8(9). e022233–e022233. 82 indexed citations
5.
Kirkpatrick, Emma, et al.. (2017). Understanding Plain English summaries. A comparison of two approaches to improve the quality of Plain English summaries in research reports. Research Involvement and Engagement. 3(1). 17–17. 24 indexed citations
6.
Basu, Anna, et al.. (2017). The Tyneside Pegboard Test: development, validation, and observations in unilateral cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 60(3). 314–321. 12 indexed citations
7.
Hennessy, Catherine, Emma Kirkpatrick, Claire F. Smith, & Scott Border. (2016). Social media and anatomy education: Using twitter to enhance the student learning experience in anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education. 9(6). 505–515. 113 indexed citations
8.
Kirkpatrick, Emma, et al.. (2016). Effect of parent‐delivered action observation therapy on upper limb function in unilateral cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 58(10). 1049–1056. 44 indexed citations
9.
Kirkpatrick, Emma, et al.. (2013). Motor planning ability is not related to lesion side or functional manual ability in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Experimental Brain Research. 231(2). 239–247. 13 indexed citations
10.
Cooper, Nicholas R., et al.. (2011). Bridging a yawning chasm: EEG investigations into the debate concerning the role of the human mirror neuron system in contagious yawning. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. 12(2). 393–405. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026