Amanda Blatch-Jones
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Economics and Econometrics
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- James RafteryEmma KirkpatrickMatthew GloverTrisha GreenhalghStephen HanneyAlejandra Recio‐SaucedoKathryn FackrellKatie Meadmore
- Topics
- Health and Medical Research Impacts (6 papers)scientometrics and bibliometrics research (5 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Statistics, Probability and UncertaintyGeneral Health ProfessionsInformation Systems and Management
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Amanda Blatch-Jones
16 papers receiving 257 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- General Health Professions 98
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 65
- Economics and Econometrics 64
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 47
- Sociology and Political Science 29
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Blatch-Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Blatch-Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Blatch-Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Blatch-Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Blatch-Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Blatch-Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Blatch-Jones. The network helps show where Amanda Blatch-Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Blatch-Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Blatch-Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Blatch-Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Blatch-Jones. Amanda Blatch-Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 82 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | Updated systematic review | 5 |
| 18 | 59 |
About Amanda Blatch-Jones
Amanda Blatch-Jones is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Information Systems and Management and Anatomy, having authored 18 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health and Medical Research Impacts (6 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (5 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (47 citations), General Health Professions (98 citations) and Information Systems and Management (16 citations). Amanda Blatch-Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James Raftery, Emma Kirkpatrick, Matthew Glover, Trisha Greenhalgh, Stephen Hanney, Alejandra Recio‐Saucedo, Kathryn Fackrell, Katie Meadmore, Simon Fraser and Mark Mullee. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.