Amanda Blatch-Jones

699 total citations
18 papers, 263 citations indexed

About

Amanda Blatch-Jones is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda Blatch-Jones has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 263 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 7 papers in General Health Professions and 5 papers in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in Amanda Blatch-Jones's work include Health and Medical Research Impacts (6 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (5 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers). Amanda Blatch-Jones is often cited by papers focused on Health and Medical Research Impacts (6 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (5 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers). Amanda Blatch-Jones collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Amanda Blatch-Jones's co-authors include James Raftery, Emma Kirkpatrick, Matthew Glover, Trisha Greenhalgh, Stephen Hanney, Alejandra Recio‐Saucedo, Kathryn Fackrell, Katie Meadmore, Simon Fraser and Mark Mullee and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

Amanda Blatch-Jones

16 papers receiving 257 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amanda Blatch-Jones United Kingdom 7 98 65 64 47 29 18 263
Ružica Tokalić Croatia 10 90 0.9× 110 1.7× 50 0.8× 75 1.6× 32 1.1× 33 300
Philippe Amiel France 9 83 0.8× 136 2.1× 39 0.6× 48 1.0× 41 1.4× 23 310
Elisabeth Kato United States 10 173 1.8× 89 1.4× 71 1.1× 84 1.8× 51 1.8× 21 377
Loes Knaapen Canada 10 215 2.2× 232 3.6× 91 1.4× 26 0.6× 25 0.9× 14 451
David Newbold United Kingdom 8 98 1.0× 36 0.6× 33 0.5× 8 0.2× 26 0.9× 37 346
Sandra Walsh Australia 10 129 1.3× 81 1.2× 25 0.4× 9 0.2× 25 0.9× 43 305
Reem El Sherif Canada 10 187 1.9× 42 0.6× 17 0.3× 13 0.3× 54 1.9× 31 342
Barbara Nail‐Chiwetalu United States 5 131 1.3× 61 0.9× 19 0.3× 27 0.6× 17 0.6× 7 295
Andria Hanbury United Kingdom 10 141 1.4× 46 0.7× 45 0.7× 16 0.3× 35 1.2× 27 367
Bruce P. Squires United States 8 102 1.0× 121 1.9× 60 0.9× 113 2.4× 24 0.8× 38 438

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Blatch-Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Blatch-Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Blatch-Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Blatch-Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Blatch-Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Blatch-Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Blatch-Jones. The network helps show where Amanda Blatch-Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Blatch-Jones

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Blatch-Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Blatch-Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Blatch-Jones. Amanda Blatch-Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Blatch-Jones, Amanda, et al.. (2025). Exploring the potential benefits and challenges of artificial intelligence for research funding organisations: a scoping review. F1000Research. 14. 126–126. 1 indexed citations
2.
Blatch-Jones, Amanda, et al.. (2024). A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture. F1000Research. 13. 324–324. 1 indexed citations
3.
4.
Blatch-Jones, Amanda, et al.. (2023). The post-award effort of managing and reporting on funded research: a scoping review. F1000Research. 12. 863–863. 2 indexed citations
5.
Blatch-Jones, Amanda, et al.. (2023). The post-award effort of managing and reporting on funded research: a scoping review. F1000Research. 12. 863–863. 1 indexed citations
6.
Blatch-Jones, Amanda, et al.. (2023). The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review. PLoS ONE. 18(9). e0291627–e0291627. 5 indexed citations
7.
Blatch-Jones, Amanda, et al.. (2023). The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: a scoping review. SocArXiv (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations
8.
9.
Recio‐Saucedo, Alejandra, et al.. (2022). What works for peer review and decision-making in research funding: a realist synthesis. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(1). 2–2. 19 indexed citations
10.
Fackrell, Kathryn, et al.. (2021). Identification and comparison of key criteria of feedback of funding decisions: mixed-methods analysis of funder and applicant perspectives. BMJ Open. 11(9). e048979–e048979. 1 indexed citations
11.
12.
Blatch-Jones, Amanda, Jacqueline Nuttall, Mark Mullee, et al.. (2020). Using digital tools in the recruitment and retention in randomised controlled trials: survey of UK Clinical Trial Units and a qualitative study. Trials. 21(1). 304–304. 31 indexed citations
13.
Blatch-Jones, Amanda, et al.. (2019). VP55 Trial Recruitment & Retention Using Digital Tools: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 35(S1). 89–89.
14.
15.
Blatch-Jones, Amanda, et al.. (2018). Role of feasibility and pilot studies in randomised controlled trials: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 8(9). e022233–e022233. 82 indexed citations
16.
Hanney, Stephen, Trisha Greenhalgh, Amanda Blatch-Jones, Matthew Glover, & James Raftery. (2017). The impact on healthcare, policy and practice from 36 multi-project research programmes: findings from two reviews. Health Research Policy and Systems. 15(1). 26–26. 33 indexed citations
17.
Raftery, James, Stephen Hanney, Trisha Greenhalgh, Matthew Glover, & Amanda Blatch-Jones. (2016). Updated systematic review. 5 indexed citations
18.
Raftery, James, Stephen Hanney, Trisha Greenhalgh, Matthew Glover, & Amanda Blatch-Jones. (2016). Models and applications for measuring the impact of health research: update of a systematic review for the Health Technology Assessment programme. Health Technology Assessment. 20(76). 1–254. 59 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ružica Tokalić Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Philippe Amiel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elisabeth Kato Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Loes Knaapen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David Newbold Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sandra Walsh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Reem El Sherif Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Barbara Nail‐Chiwetalu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andria Hanbury Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bruce P. Squires
Rankless by CCL
2026