David Wright

2.0k total citations
60 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

David Wright is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Oncology and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, David Wright has authored 60 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in General Health Professions, 15 papers in Oncology and 13 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in David Wright's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (13 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (11 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (8 papers). David Wright is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (13 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (11 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (8 papers). David Wright collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. David Wright's co-authors include Jane B. Hopkinson, Claire Foster, Jessica Corner, Holly A. Hill, Liz Roffe, Richard F. Lockey, John W. McDonald, Dennis K. Ledford, Robert P. Nelson and Walter L. Trudeau and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

In The Last Decade

David Wright

56 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Wright United Kingdom 19 320 319 306 264 234 60 1.3k
Kaan Tunceli United States 23 245 0.8× 185 0.6× 336 1.1× 229 0.9× 255 1.1× 61 2.1k
Smita Shah Australia 22 121 0.4× 420 1.3× 490 1.6× 123 0.5× 573 2.4× 108 1.7k
Karen Collins United Kingdom 23 638 2.0× 521 1.6× 650 2.1× 111 0.4× 93 0.4× 69 1.8k
Roee Gutman United States 21 96 0.3× 197 0.6× 319 1.0× 91 0.3× 76 0.3× 100 1.4k
Abigail B. Shoben United States 23 91 0.3× 286 0.9× 252 0.8× 180 0.7× 280 1.2× 124 1.8k
Anne‐Déborah Bouhnik France 25 398 1.2× 325 1.0× 504 1.6× 222 0.8× 44 0.2× 113 1.9k
Deborah Shatin United States 27 69 0.2× 180 0.6× 168 0.5× 152 0.6× 182 0.8× 44 2.3k
Denis Agniel United States 20 75 0.2× 486 1.5× 394 1.3× 219 0.8× 47 0.2× 78 1.8k
Angelos P. Kassianos United Kingdom 21 286 0.9× 257 0.8× 262 0.9× 89 0.3× 93 0.4× 67 1.3k
Paul M. Bakaki United States 20 360 1.1× 146 0.5× 451 1.5× 386 1.5× 128 0.5× 44 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by David Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Wright. The network helps show where David Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Wright. David Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Lippiett, Kate, et al.. (2024). Barriers and facilitators to integrated cancer care between primary and secondary care: a scoping review. Supportive Care in Cancer. 32(2). 120–120. 7 indexed citations
3.
Keene, Oliver N., et al.. (2023). Why estimands are needed to define treatment effects in clinical trials. BMC Medicine. 21(1). 276–276. 15 indexed citations
4.
Vassilev, Ivaylo, Sharon Lin, Lynn Calman, et al.. (2023). The role of social networks in the self-management support for young women recently diagnosed with breast cancer. PLoS ONE. 18(4). e0282183–e0282183. 7 indexed citations
5.
Hefting, Nanco, et al.. (2022). Marking 2-Years of New Thinking in Clinical Trials: The Estimand Journey. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. 56(4). 637–650. 15 indexed citations
6.
Wright, David, et al.. (2020). Building research capacity in musculoskeletal health: qualitative evaluation of a graduate nurse and allied health professional internship programme. BMC Health Services Research. 20(1). 751–751. 10 indexed citations
7.
Frankland, Jane, Sally Wheelwright, David Wright, et al.. (2020). Prevalence and predictors of poor sexual well-being over 5 years following treatment for colorectal cancer: results from the ColoREctal Wellbeing (CREW) prospective longitudinal study. BMJ Open. 10(11). e038953–e038953. 11 indexed citations
8.
Wright, David, et al.. (2017). Can a Total Knee Arthroplasty Perioperative Surgical Home Close the Gap Between Primary and Revision TKA Outcomes?. PubMed. 45(7). E458–E464. 3 indexed citations
9.
Kirkpatrick, Emma, et al.. (2017). Understanding Plain English summaries. A comparison of two approaches to improve the quality of Plain English summaries in research reports. Research Involvement and Engagement. 3(1). 17–17. 24 indexed citations
10.
Wright, David, Amanda Young, Emma Iserman, et al.. (2014). The clinical relevance and newsworthiness of NIHR HTA-funded research: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 4(5). e004556–e004556. 5 indexed citations
11.
Turner, Sheila, et al.. (2013). Publication rate for funded studies from a major UK health research funder: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 3(5). e002521–e002521. 21 indexed citations
12.
13.
Foster, Claire, David Wright, Holly A. Hill, Jane B. Hopkinson, & Liz Roffe. (2009). Psychosocial implications of living 5 years or more following a cancer diagnosis: a systematic review of the research evidence. European Journal of Cancer Care. 18(3). 223–247. 185 indexed citations
14.
Hopkinson, Jane B., Claire Foster, Peter Nicholls, et al.. (2008). Overcoming obstacles to conducting trials in the context of palliative care: an exploratory phase II cluster randomised trial to investigate the effectiveness of the Macmillan Approach to Weight Loss and Eating Difficulties (MAWE). ORCA Online Research @Cardiff. 2 indexed citations
15.
Day, Simon, et al.. (2008). Assessing the impact of ICH E9. Pharmaceutical Statistics. 7(2). 77–87. 6 indexed citations
16.
Hopkinson, Jane B., David Wright, John W. McDonald, & Jessica Corner. (2006). The Prevalence of Concern About Weight Loss and Change in Eating Habits in People with Advanced Cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 32(4). 322–331. 104 indexed citations
17.
Hopkinson, Jane B., David Wright, & Jessica Corner. (2006). Exploring the experience of weight loss in people with advanced cancer. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 54(3). 304–312. 75 indexed citations
18.
Wright, David. (2005). Role of networks in supporting emergency medicine research: findings from the Wessex emergency care research network (WECReN). Emergency Medicine Journal. 22(2). 80–83. 7 indexed citations
19.
Wright, David, et al.. (1999). Quality and general practice accreditation: The approach of Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited. Australian Health Review. 22(4). 161–171. 2 indexed citations
20.
Wright, David, et al.. (1990). Serum IgE and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 85(2). 445–452. 114 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kaan Tunceli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Smita Shah Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karen Collins Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Roee Gutman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Abigail B. Shoben Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anne‐Déborah Bouhnik Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Deborah Shatin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Denis Agniel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Angelos P. Kassianos Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Paul M. Bakaki
Rankless by CCL
2026