David Wright

56 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

David Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 73
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 264
  • General Health Professions 306
  • Oncology 320
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 319
Replace Denis Agniel with:
Denis Agniel United States
Isabella Locatelli Switzerland
Rieke van der Graaf Netherlands
David I. Shalowitz United States
Abigail B. Shoben United States
Giacomo Scaioli Italy
Roee Gutman United States
Loring G. Dales United States
Catherine R. Lesko United States
Kaan Tunceli United States
David Wright relative to Denis Agniel United States Denis Agniel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Denis Agniel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Wright. The network helps show where David Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Wright Line = papers co-authored together David Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009185
2 1990114
3 2006104
4 200675
5 200671
6 201070
7 201056
8 200754
9 200547
10 200638
11 200337
12 202035
13 200830
14 201427
15 201724
16 201321
17 202021
18 199020
19 202118
20 201117

About David Wright

David Wright is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Statistics and Probability, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Library and Information Sciences and General Health Professions, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (13 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (11 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (8 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (6 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers), Family Support in Illness (5 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (73 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (264 citations), General Health Professions (306 citations), Oncology (320 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (319 citations). David Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jane B. Hopkinson, Claire Foster, Jessica Corner, Holly A. Hill, Liz Roffe, Richard F. Lockey, John W. McDonald, Dennis K. Ledford, Robert P. Nelson and Walter L. Trudeau. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Pharmaceutical Statistics, Health Expectations, Palliative Medicine and Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026