Emma Pitchforth

3.8k citations
106 papers · 2.3k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 25

Emma Pitchforth

99 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Hit Papers

Factors Affecting Physician Professional Satisfaction and...5292014202620182022100200300400500

Peers

Emma Pitchforth
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Health Information Management 321
  • General Health Professions 1.1k
  • Emergency Medical Services 202
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 183
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 233
Replace Naomi Fulop with:
Naomi Fulop United Kingdom
Gianfranco Damiani Italy
Milena Pavlova Netherlands
Sarah A. Birken United States
Bethany Hedt‐Gauthier United States
Amirhossein Takian Iran
Irène Akua Agyepong Ghana
Andrew Bazemore United States
Joanne Travaglia Australia
William Hogg Canada
Emma Pitchforth relative to Naomi Fulop United Kingdom Naomi Fulop's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Naomi Fulop · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Pitchforth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Pitchforth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Pitchforth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Pitchforth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Pitchforth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Pitchforth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Pitchforth. The network helps show where Emma Pitchforth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Pitchforth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Pitchforth Line = papers co-authored together Emma Pitchforth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20250
3 20252
4 20242
5 20243
6 20243
7 202315
8 20231
9 202313
10 202212
11 201916
12 20197
13 201823
14 201633
15 201512
16 20142
17 201013
18 200938
19 20089
20
Lost words: research via translation.
20076

About Emma Pitchforth

Emma Pitchforth is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, General Health Professions and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 106 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (18 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (15 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (11 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (10 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (7 papers), Global Health Care Issues (7 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers) and Antibiotic Use and Resistance (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (321 citations), General Health Professions (1.1k citations) and Emergency Medical Services (202 citations). Emma Pitchforth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Nepal. Frequent co-authors include Edwin van Teijlingen, Chau Pham, Mark W. Friedberg, Francis J. Crosson, Denise D. Quigley, Michael Tutty, Peggy G. Chen, Soeren Mattke, Frances M. Aunon and John Caloyeras. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of General Practice, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, BMJ Open, Journal of Health Services Research & Policy and Globalization and Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026