Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Gould's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Gould with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Gould more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Gould. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Gould. The network helps show where Daniel Gould may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Gould
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Gould.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Gould based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Gould. Daniel Gould is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Santos, Fernando, et al.. (2020). Implementing Positive Youth Development in Primary Physical Education: The Learning Trajectories of a Physical Education Department Head. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 83(38). 528–536.1 indexed citations
Martin, Eric, et al.. (2018). The Association Between the Coach-Athlete Relationship and Burnout Among High School Coaches. Scholar Works (Boise State University). 41(1). 107.6 indexed citations
Gould, Daniel, et al.. (2012). The Views of More Versus Less Experienced Coaches in Underserved Communities. 6(1). 3–26.13 indexed citations
11.
Gould, Daniel & Sarah Carson. (2011). Young Athletes Perceptions of the Relationship between Coaching Behaviors and Developmental Experiences. 5(2). 3–29.21 indexed citations
12.
Gould, Daniel, et al.. (2010). How and Why University Coaches Define, Identify, and Recruit ‘Intangibles’. 4(2). 15–35.2 indexed citations
Collins, Karen, Daniel Gould, Larry Lauer, & Y. Barry Chung. (2009). Coaching Life Skills through Football. 3(1). 29–54.3 indexed citations
15.
Collins, Karen, Daniel Gould, Larry Lauer, & Y. Barry Chung. (2009). Coaching Life Skills through Football :Philosophical Beliefs of Outstanding High School Football Coaches. 3(1). 29–54.39 indexed citations
16.
Mullins, Gray & Daniel Gould. (2004). Quality in postgraduate research education: what are the real issues?. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).
17.
Gould, Daniel & Sarah Carson. (2004). Fun & Games?: Myths Surrounding the Role of Youth Sports in Developing Olympic Champions. Youth studies Australia. 23(1). 19–26.25 indexed citations
18.
Gould, Daniel, Kristen Dieffenbach, & Aaron Moffett. (2002). Psychological Characteristics and Their Development in Olympic Champions. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 14(3). 172–204.722 indexed citations breakdown →
Gould, Daniel. (1981). The Role of the Physical Educator in Nonschool Youth Sports.. The Physical Educator. 38(2). 99–104.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.