Emily Richard

2.1k total citations
35 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Emily Richard is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Research and Theory and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Richard has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in General Health Professions, 13 papers in Research and Theory and 9 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Emily Richard's work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (13 papers), Nursing education and management (13 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers). Emily Richard is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (13 papers), Nursing education and management (13 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers). Emily Richard collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Emily Richard's co-authors include Heather K. Spence Laschinger, Sheila A. Boamah, Лаура Боргогни, Chiara Consiglio, Carol Wong, Junhong Zhu, Chris A. McGibbon, Ashley L. Grau, Sandra Regan and Colleen O’Connell and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Emily Richard

34 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily Richard Canada 19 961 490 441 305 238 35 1.6k
Laureen Hayes Canada 10 1.4k 1.4× 590 1.2× 465 1.1× 224 0.7× 201 0.8× 15 1.9k
Wipada Kunaviktikul Thailand 24 1.2k 1.2× 345 0.7× 171 0.4× 395 1.3× 232 1.0× 76 2.0k
Majd T. Mrayyan Jordan 21 642 0.7× 255 0.5× 272 0.6× 224 0.7× 141 0.6× 96 1.5k
Hans Martin Hasselhorn Germany 22 1.4k 1.5× 218 0.4× 431 1.0× 227 0.7× 375 1.6× 85 2.1k
Heather Spence Laschinger Canada 18 887 0.9× 312 0.6× 448 1.0× 153 0.5× 130 0.5× 30 1.4k
Mary T. Quinn Griffin United States 21 694 0.7× 238 0.5× 225 0.5× 543 1.8× 141 0.6× 47 1.6k
How Lee Canada 6 747 0.8× 469 1.0× 369 0.8× 146 0.5× 94 0.4× 8 1.3k
Jef Adriaenssens Belgium 10 1.1k 1.1× 203 0.4× 242 0.5× 519 1.7× 123 0.5× 26 1.4k
Ann Rudman Sweden 27 1.4k 1.5× 383 0.8× 194 0.4× 683 2.2× 133 0.6× 62 2.4k
Erin Stafford United States 7 643 0.7× 390 0.8× 293 0.7× 161 0.5× 89 0.4× 23 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Richard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Richard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Richard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Richard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Richard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Richard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Richard. The network helps show where Emily Richard may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Richard

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Richard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Richard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Richard. Emily Richard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Handrigan, Grant, Jeffrey J. Hébert, Chris A. McGibbon, et al.. (2023). The Effect of a Standing Intervention on Falls in Long Term Care: a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Canadian Geriatrics Journal. 26(2). 247–252. 2 indexed citations
3.
Edwards, Jonathon, Grant Handrigan, Chris A. McGibbon, et al.. (2023). Long-term care residents’ acceptance of a standing intervention: A qualitative intrinsic case study. Geriatric Nursing. 50. 94–101. 4 indexed citations
5.
Richard, Emily, et al.. (2022). Passive Remote Monitoring and Aging in Place: A Scoping Review. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement. 42(1). 20–32. 12 indexed citations
6.
Donelle, Lorie, Sandra Regan, Michael Kerr, et al.. (2020). Caring Near and Far by Connecting Community-Based Clients and Family Member/Friend Caregivers Using Passive Remote Monitoring: Protocol for a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols. 9(1). e15027–e15027. 5 indexed citations
7.
Orchard, Carole, Linda L. Pederson, Emily Richard, Cornelia Mahler, & Heather Spence Laschinger. (2018). Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS): Further Testing and Instrument Revision. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 38(1). 11–18. 58 indexed citations
8.
Richard, Emily, et al.. (2017). Nurses’ leadership self-efficacy, motivation, and career aspirations. Leadership in health services. 31(1). 47–61. 44 indexed citations
10.
Richard, Emily, Heather K. Spence Laschinger, Carol Wong, Roberta Fida, & Joan Finegan. (2016). Development and Validation of a Workplace Social Capital Questionnaire for Nurses (WSCQ-N). 1 indexed citations
11.
Laschinger, Heather K. Spence, Greta G. Cummings, Michael P. Leiter, et al.. (2016). Starting Out: A time-lagged study of new graduate nurses’ transition to practice. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 57. 82–95. 119 indexed citations
12.
Laschinger, Heather K. Spence & Emily Richard. (2016). The Effect of Authentic Leadership, Person-Job Fit, and Civility Norms on New Graduate Nurses’ Experiences of Coworker Incivility and Burnout. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 46(11). 574–580. 70 indexed citations
14.
Laschinger, Heather K. Spence, Junhong Zhu, & Emily Richard. (2016). New nurses’ perceptions of professional practice behaviours, quality of care, job satisfaction and career retention. Journal of Nursing Management. 24(5). 656–665. 74 indexed citations
15.
Boamah, Sheila A., Emily Richard, & Heather K. Spence Laschinger. (2016). Factors influencing new graduate nurse burnout development, job satisfaction and patient care quality: a time‐lagged study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 73(5). 1182–1195. 216 indexed citations
16.
Laschinger, Heather K. Spence, Emily Richard, Piotr Wilk, & Joan Finegan. (2014). The Influence of Nursing Unit Empowerment and Social Capital on Unit Effectiveness and Nurse Perceptions of Patient Care Quality. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 44(6). 347–352. 41 indexed citations
17.
Richard, Emily & Heather K. Spence Laschinger. (2013). Correlates of New Graduate Nurses’ Experiences of Workplace Mistreatment. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 43(4). 221–228. 89 indexed citations
18.
Laschinger, Heather K. Spence, et al.. (2011). The influence of leadership practices and empowerment on Canadian nurse manager outcomes. Journal of Nursing Management. 20(7). 877–888. 63 indexed citations
19.
Stuckey, Melanie I., Elizabeth Russell-Minda, Emily Richard, et al.. (2011). Diabetes and Technology for Increased Activity (DaTA) Study: Results of a Remote Monitoring Intervention for Prevention of Metabolic Syndrome. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. 5(4). 928–935. 39 indexed citations
20.
Petrella, Robert J., et al.. (2010). Diabetes and Technology for Increased Activity (DaTA) Study. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 42(5). 258–258. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026