Emer Begley
- Demography top 2%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Marita A. O’BrienSuzanne CahillInger Hilde HagenBrian J. TaylorCampbell KillickPäivi TopoTorhild HoltheJon-Paul Faulkner
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers)Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers)Elder Abuse and Neglect (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandLithuania
In The Last Decade
Emer Begley
18 papers receiving 346 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Demography 183
- General Health Professions 151
- Psychiatry and Mental health 141
- Clinical Psychology 80
- Health 55
Countries citing papers authored by Emer Begley
This map shows the geographic impact of Emer Begley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emer Begley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emer Begley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emer Begley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emer Begley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emer Begley. The network helps show where Emer Begley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emer Begley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emer Begley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emer Begley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emer Begley. Emer Begley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 37 | |
| 4 | Clinical Consensus Guidelines on the Application of Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis: Recommendations of the Irish Network for Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration. | 4 |
| 5 | 'I'd prefer to stay at home but I don't have a choice': Meeting Older People's Preference for Care: Policy, but what about practice? | 12 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | A Total Indifference to Our Dignity: Older People’s Understandings of Elder Abuse | 17 |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 64 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | Assessment of usefulness of assistive technologies for people with dementia | 5 |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 41 | |
| 19 | 37 |
About Emer Begley
Emer Begley is a scholar working on Demography, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers) and Elder Abuse and Neglect (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (183 citations), Occupational Therapy (49 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (141 citations). Emer Begley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Lithuania. Frequent co-authors include Marita A. O’Brien, Suzanne Cahill, Inger Hilde Hagen, Brian J. Taylor, Campbell Killick, Päivi Topo, Torhild Holthe, Jon-Paul Faulkner, Sarah Donnelly and Jūratė Macijauskienė. Their work appears in journals such as Age and Ageing, Alzheimer s & Dementia and Drugs & Aging.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.