Laila Øksnebjerg

620 total citations
10 papers, 394 citations indexed

About

Laila Øksnebjerg is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Laila Øksnebjerg has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 394 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in General Health Professions, 6 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 2 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Laila Øksnebjerg's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers). Laila Øksnebjerg is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers). Laila Øksnebjerg collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and Italy. Laila Øksnebjerg's co-authors include Bob Woods, Rabih Chattat, Dianne Gove, Gail Mountain, Esme Moniz‐Cook, Ana Diaz‐Ponce, Gunhild Waldemar, Jean Georges, Chris Clarke and Ana Diaz and has published in prestigious journals such as Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, International Psychogeriatrics and Gerontology.

In The Last Decade

Laila Øksnebjerg

10 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Laila Øksnebjerg Denmark 8 251 213 72 64 44 10 394
Ana Diaz‐Ponce United Kingdom 9 311 1.2× 220 1.0× 35 0.5× 75 1.2× 56 1.3× 16 444
Shirley Evans United Kingdom 10 252 1.0× 257 1.2× 119 1.7× 45 0.7× 42 1.0× 35 496
Marijke Span Netherlands 9 269 1.1× 247 1.2× 176 2.4× 119 1.9× 52 1.2× 15 531
Steve Lauriks Netherlands 7 152 0.6× 140 0.7× 104 1.4× 39 0.6× 63 1.4× 17 332
Eleanor Bantry White Ireland 12 137 0.5× 106 0.5× 85 1.2× 37 0.6× 103 2.3× 27 407
Louise McCabe United Kingdom 11 194 0.8× 118 0.6× 60 0.8× 58 0.9× 76 1.7× 36 406
Rachael Litherland United Kingdom 10 180 0.7× 169 0.8× 33 0.5× 31 0.5× 60 1.4× 24 313
Bart Hattink Netherlands 7 178 0.7× 219 1.0× 113 1.6× 43 0.7× 66 1.5× 8 355
Jessica Marian Goodman‐Casanova Spain 6 102 0.4× 98 0.5× 56 0.8× 70 1.1× 134 3.0× 16 334
Emer Begley United Kingdom 12 151 0.6× 141 0.7× 183 2.5× 35 0.5× 80 1.8× 19 366

Countries citing papers authored by Laila Øksnebjerg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laila Øksnebjerg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laila Øksnebjerg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laila Øksnebjerg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laila Øksnebjerg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laila Øksnebjerg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laila Øksnebjerg. The network helps show where Laila Øksnebjerg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laila Øksnebjerg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laila Øksnebjerg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laila Øksnebjerg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laila Øksnebjerg. Laila Øksnebjerg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Barbosa, Ana, Ana Rita Ferreira, Carolien Smits, et al.. (2023). Use and uptake of technology by people with dementia and their supporters during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aging & Mental Health. 28(1). 83–94. 15 indexed citations
3.
Clarke, Chris, Bob Woods, Esme Moniz‐Cook, et al.. (2020). Measuring the well-being of people with dementia: a conceptual scoping review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 18(1). 249–249. 64 indexed citations
4.
Øksnebjerg, Laila, et al.. (2019). A Tablet App Supporting Self-Management for People With Dementia: Explorative Study of Adoption and Use Patterns. JMIR mhealth and uhealth. 8(1). e14694–e14694. 34 indexed citations
5.
Øksnebjerg, Laila, Janet Janbek, Bob Woods, & Gunhild Waldemar. (2019). Assistive technology designed to support self-management of people with dementia: user involvement, dissemination, and adoption. A scoping review. International Psychogeriatrics. 32(8). 937–953. 19 indexed citations
6.
Øksnebjerg, Laila, Bob Woods, & Gunhild Waldemar. (2019). Designing the ReACT App to Support Self-Management of People with Dementia: An Iterative User-Involving Process. Gerontology. 65(6). 673–685. 21 indexed citations
7.
8.
Øksnebjerg, Laila, Ana Diaz‐Ponce, Dianne Gove, et al.. (2018). Towards capturing meaningful outcomes for people with dementia in psychosocial intervention research: A pan‐European consultation. Health Expectations. 21(6). 1056–1065. 53 indexed citations
9.
Gove, Dianne, Ana Diaz‐Ponce, Jean Georges, et al.. (2017). Alzheimer Europe's position on involving people with dementia in research through PPI (patient and public involvement). Aging & Mental Health. 22(6). 723–729. 156 indexed citations
10.
Øksnebjerg, Laila & Gunhild Waldemar. (2012). [Efficacy of cognitive stimulation therapy in patients with dementia].. PubMed. 174(50). 3161–4. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026