Robert F. Coen
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Physiology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Brian LawlorDavis CoakleyCathal WalshConal CunninghamGregory SwanwickCiaran A. O’BoyleRose Anne KennyMuireann Irish
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (62 papers)Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (17 papers)Frailty in Older Adults (10 papers)
- Cited by
- Psychiatry and Mental healthNeuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyGeriatrics and Gerontology
- Journals
- American Journal of PsychiatryThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & MetabolismBiological Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- IrelandCzechiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Robert F. Coen
99 papers receiving 4.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Psychiatry and Mental health 2.0k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 995
- Physiology 727
- General Health Professions 708
- Clinical Psychology 470
Countries citing papers authored by Robert F. Coen
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert F. Coen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert F. Coen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert F. Coen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert F. Coen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert F. Coen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert F. Coen. The network helps show where Robert F. Coen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert F. Coen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert F. Coen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert F. Coen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert F. Coen. Robert F. Coen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 77 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | The National Single Assessment Tool (SAT) a pilot study in older persons care-survey results. | 2 |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 77 | |
| 8 | 57 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 88 | |
| 11 | 194 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 70 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 97 | |
| 17 | 38 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Robert F. Coen
Robert F. Coen is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 101 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (62 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (17 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (2.0k citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (147 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (335 citations). Robert F. Coen has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Czechia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Brian Lawlor, Davis Coakley, Cathal Walsh, Conal Cunningham, Gregory Swanwick, Ciaran A. O’Boyle, Rose Anne Kenny, Muireann Irish, George M. Savva and Shane M. O’Mara. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.