Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design
2012996 citationsJennifer Shirk, Heidi L. Ballard et al.Ecology and Societyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Ellen McCallie
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen McCallie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen McCallie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen McCallie more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen McCallie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen McCallie. The network helps show where Ellen McCallie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ellen McCallie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ellen McCallie.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ellen McCallie based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ellen McCallie. Ellen McCallie is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Shirk, Jennifer, Heidi L. Ballard, Candie C. Wilderman, et al.. (2012). Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design. Ecology and Society. 17(2).996 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Eisenkraft, Arthur, et al.. (2010). Informal Science Education Policy: Issues and Opportunities. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report..3 indexed citations
3.
McCallie, Ellen, et al.. (2009). Many Experts, Many Audiences: Public Engagement with Science and Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report..56 indexed citations
4.
McCallie, Ellen, et al.. (2009). Many Experts, Many Audiences: Public Engagement with Science and Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Executive Summary..1 indexed citations
5.
Bonney, Rick, Heidi L. Ballard, Rebecca Jordan, et al.. (2009). Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report..332 indexed citations
6.
McCallie, Ellen, et al.. (2009). Many Experts, Many Audiences: Public Engagement with Science and Informal Science Education. DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University). 1–83.90 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.