Elizabeth Monk
- Accounting top 5%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Christine HelliarClare RobertsSonja GallhoferJim HaslamLouise CrawfordMassimo ContrafattoIan ThomsonLorna Stevenson
- Topics
- Accounting Education and Careers (5 papers)Accounting and Organizational Management (4 papers)Child Abuse and Related Trauma (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaSocial Science & MedicineAccounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth Monk
17 papers receiving 435 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Accounting 199
- Management Information Systems 143
- Strategy and Management 92
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 66
- Sociology and Political Science 63
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Monk
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Monk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Monk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Monk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Monk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Monk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Monk. The network helps show where Elizabeth Monk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Monk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Monk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Monk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Monk. Elizabeth Monk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 44 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 78 | |
| 11 | IES Compliance and the knowledge, skills and values of IES 2, 3 and 4 | 2 |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | The development of an audit learning package: SCAM | 2 |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 171 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 35 |
About Elizabeth Monk
Elizabeth Monk is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Accounting and Emergency Medicine, having authored 18 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Accounting Education and Careers (5 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (4 papers) and Child Abuse and Related Trauma (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (199 citations), Management Information Systems (143 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (45 citations). Elizabeth Monk has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christine Helliar, Clare Roberts, Sonja Gallhofer, Jim Haslam, Louise Crawford, Massimo Contrafatto, Ian Thomson, Lorna Stevenson, Monica Veneziani and Colin R. Paterson. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science & Medicine and Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.