Elisabeth Schäfer

910 total citations
29 papers, 723 citations indexed

About

Elisabeth Schäfer is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Elisabeth Schäfer has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 723 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 6 papers in Clinical Psychology and 6 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Elisabeth Schäfer's work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (6 papers) and Nutritional Studies and Diet (5 papers). Elisabeth Schäfer is often cited by papers focused on Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (6 papers) and Nutritional Studies and Diet (5 papers). Elisabeth Schäfer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and United Kingdom. Elisabeth Schäfer's co-authors include Robert B. Schafer, Douglas S. Lewis, Eric Hoiberg, Gordon L. Bultena, Cheryl O. Hausafus, Patricia M. Keith, Martin Dunbar, Ardith Brunt, Marianthi Ierapetritou and Pat M. Keith and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Journal of Nutrition and Powder Technology.

In The Last Decade

Elisabeth Schäfer

29 papers receiving 658 citations

Peers

Elisabeth Schäfer
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 255
  • General Health Professions 172
  • Food Science 115
  • Clinical Psychology 97
  • Epidemiology 94
Replace Gail E. Gates with:
Gail E. Gates United States
Paul Campbell United States
Laura S. Sims United States
Natalya Usheva Bulgaria
Andrew Brown Australia
Susan Borra United States
Gwen Costa Jacobsohn United States
Eman Zmaily Dahmash Jordan
Alicia S. Landry United States
Celine Murrin Ireland
Gail E. Gates United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Elisabeth Schäfer
Elisabeth Schäfer · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Elisabeth Schäfer
Elisabeth Schäfer · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Elisabeth Schäfer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elisabeth Schäfer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elisabeth Schäfer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elisabeth Schäfer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elisabeth Schäfer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elisabeth Schäfer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elisabeth Schäfer. The network helps show where Elisabeth Schäfer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elisabeth Schäfer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elisabeth Schäfer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elisabeth Schäfer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elisabeth Schäfer. Elisabeth Schäfer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 8
2 2
3 47
4 54
5 1
6 118
7 6
8 11
9 60
10 19
11 4
12 10
13 104
14 18
15 8
16 10
17 91
18 2
19 54
20 6

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026