Robert B. Schafer

1.4k citations
56 papers · 1.0k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Robert B. Schafer

54 papers receiving 878 citations

Peers

Robert B. Schafer
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Applied Psychology 97
  • Gender Studies 151
  • Social Psychology 283
  • Demography 139
  • Sociology and Political Science 418
Replace Pat M. Keith with:
Pat M. Keith United States
Robin O'Neil United States
Vaida D. Thompson United States
Patricia M. Keith United States
P. Neal Ritchey United States
Bruce Headey Australia
Susan Roxburgh United States
Karen Trew United Kingdom
Claudine Herzlich France
Tim Baker United States
Robert B. Schafer relative to Pat M. Keith United States Pat M. Keith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Pat M. Keith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert B. Schafer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert B. Schafer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert B. Schafer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert B. Schafer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert B. Schafer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert B. Schafer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert B. Schafer. The network helps show where Robert B. Schafer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Robert B. Schafer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert B. Schafer Line = papers co-authored together Robert B. Schafer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980129
2 199391
3 197863
4 199960
5 198057
6 199655
7 198954
8 198146
9 198140
10 198529
11 198226
12 199824
13 199024
14 199321
15 199919
16 198418
17 199518
18 198617
19 198716
20 199315

About Robert B. Schafer

Robert B. Schafer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Demography, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Work-Family Balance Challenges (15 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (8 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (7 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (7 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (97 citations), Gender Studies (151 citations), Social Psychology (283 citations), Demography (139 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (418 citations). Robert B. Schafer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Pat M. Keith, Patricia M. Keith, Elisabeth Schäfer, Eric Hoiberg, Gordon L. Bultena, K. A. S. Wickrama, Martin Dunbar, Debra Umberson, Frederick O. Lorenz and David W. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Marriage and the Family, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, The Journal of Social Psychology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Journal of Family Issues.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact