Patricia M. Keith
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Demography top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Co-authors
- Robert B. SchaferWillis J. GoudyElisabeth SchäferEdward A. PowersElizabeth PowersCynthia DobsonK. A. S. WickramaMartin Dunbar
- Topics
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (7 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers)Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Patricia M. Keith
36 papers receiving 551 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Social Psychology 230
- Sociology and Political Science 225
- Clinical Psychology 164
- Demography 156
- General Health Professions 128
Countries citing papers authored by Patricia M. Keith
This map shows the geographic impact of Patricia M. Keith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patricia M. Keith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patricia M. Keith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Patricia M. Keith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patricia M. Keith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patricia M. Keith. The network helps show where Patricia M. Keith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Patricia M. Keith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Patricia M. Keith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Patricia M. Keith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Patricia M. Keith. Patricia M. Keith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 60 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 55 | |
| 7 | Savings and credit: women's informal groups as models for change in developing countries. | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 46 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Patricia M. Keith
Patricia M. Keith is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Health and Demography, having authored 37 papers that have together received 661 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (7 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (38 citations), Demography (156 citations) and Social Psychology (230 citations). Patricia M. Keith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Robert B. Schafer, Willis J. Goudy, Elisabeth Schäfer, Edward A. Powers, Elizabeth Powers, Cynthia Dobson, K. A. S. Wickrama, Martin Dunbar, Timothy H. Brubaker and Robbyn R. Wacker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.