Elisabeth M. Bik
- Molecular Biology top 0.5%
- Infectious Diseases top 0.5%
- Food Science top 0.1%
- Physiology top 1%
- Epidemiology top 1%
- Co-authors
- David A. RelmanPaul B. EckburgSteven R. GillWilliam NelsonLes DethlefsenElizabeth PurdomMichael SargentÇharles N. Bernstein
- Topics
- Gut microbiota and health (17 papers)Probiotics and Fermented Foods (8 papers)Academic integrity and plagiarism (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Elisabeth M. Bik
45 papers receiving 13.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 188
- Molecular Biology 8.7k
- Infectious Diseases 2.8k
- Food Science 2.4k
- Physiology 2.0k
- Epidemiology 2.0k
Countries citing papers authored by Elisabeth M. Bik
This map shows the geographic impact of Elisabeth M. Bik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elisabeth M. Bik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elisabeth M. Bik more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elisabeth M. Bik
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elisabeth M. Bik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elisabeth M. Bik. The network helps show where Elisabeth M. Bik may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elisabeth M. Bik
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elisabeth M. Bik. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elisabeth M. Bik based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elisabeth M. Bik. Elisabeth M. Bik is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 30 | |
| 7 | 102 | |
| 8 | 75 | |
| 9 | 139 | |
| 10 | 248 | |
| 11 | 169 | |
| 12 | Bacterial diversity associated with Drosophila in the laboratory and in the natural environment | 2 |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | Bacterial diversity in the oral cavity of 10 healthy individualsbreakdown → | 492 |
| 15 | 364 | |
| 16 | 45 | |
| 17 | Microbial Prevalence, Diversity and Abundance in Amniotic Fluid During Preterm Labor: A Molecular and Culture-Based Investigationbreakdown → | 573 |
| 18 | 467 | |
| 19 | Development of the Human Infant Intestinal Microbiotabreakdown → | 2097 |
| 20 | Molecular analysis of the bacterial microbiota in the human stomachbreakdown → | 817 |
About Elisabeth M. Bik
Elisabeth M. Bik is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Endocrinology and Safety Research, having authored 45 papers that have together received 13.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gut microbiota and health (17 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (8 papers) and Academic integrity and plagiarism (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (1.2k citations), Biological Psychiatry (383 citations) and Infectious Diseases (2.8k citations). Elisabeth M. Bik has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David A. Relman, Paul B. Eckburg, Steven R. Gill, William Nelson, Les Dethlefsen, Elizabeth Purdom, Michael Sargent, Çharles N. Bernstein, Daniel B. DiGiulio and Patrick O. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.