Elaine Jay

513 citations
14 papers · 267 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Elaine Jay

13 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

Elaine Jay
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 81
  • Communication 37
  • Sociology and Political Science 214
  • Information Systems and Management 29
  • Marketing 30
Replace Dwight F. Burlingame with:
Dwight F. Burlingame United States
Anita Mangan United Kingdom
Ana M. Sariol United States
Tracey M. Coule United Kingdom
Maja Korica United Kingdom
Albert J. Mills Canada
Roberto Frega France
Daryl D’Art Ireland
Wendy Scaife Australia
Lindsay Nelson Australia
Elaine Jay relative to Dwight F. Burlingame United States Dwight F. Burlingame's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Dwight F. Burlingame · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elaine Jay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elaine Jay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elaine Jay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elaine Jay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elaine Jay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elaine Jay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elaine Jay. The network helps show where Elaine Jay may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Elaine Jay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elaine Jay Line = papers co-authored together Elaine Jay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 200757
2
Fundraising Management: Analysis, Planning and Practice
200457
3 201430
4
Building Donor Loyalty: The Fundraiser's Guide to Increasing Lifetime Value
200426
5 200425
6 200622
7 200112
8 200810
9 20028
10 20037
11 20026
12 20086
13
Fundraising training in the U.K.: An assesment of current provision
20061
14
The future of giving
20030

About Elaine Jay

Elaine Jay is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Strategy and Management, having authored 14 papers that have together received 267 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (10 papers), Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (4 papers), FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance (2 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (1 paper), Sustainability, Governance, and Employment Studies (1 paper), Religion, Society, and Development (1 paper) and Education, Sociology, Communication Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (81 citations), Communication (37 citations), Sociology and Political Science (214 citations), Information Systems and Management (29 citations) and Marketing (30 citations). Elaine Jay has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Adrian Sargeant, Douglas West, Stephen Lee and Stephen Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Nonprofit Management and Leadership, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Journal of Marketing Management, PLoS ONE and Journal of Direct Data and Digital Marketing Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact