Edieal J. Pinker

2.3k total citations
67 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Edieal J. Pinker is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Edieal J. Pinker has authored 67 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Management Information Systems, 18 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 13 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Edieal J. Pinker's work include Supply Chain and Inventory Management (18 papers), Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (13 papers) and Auction Theory and Applications (12 papers). Edieal J. Pinker is often cited by papers focused on Supply Chain and Inventory Management (18 papers), Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (13 papers) and Auction Theory and Applications (12 papers). Edieal J. Pinker collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Canada. Edieal J. Pinker's co-authors include Robert A. Shumsky, Abraham Seidmann, Yaniv Vakrat, Gregory Dobson, Sameer Hasija, Richard C. Larson, Hsiao‐Hui Lee, Joseph Milner, Oded Berman and Tolga Tezcan and has published in prestigious journals such as Management Science, Communications of the ACM and European Journal of Operational Research.

In The Last Decade

Edieal J. Pinker

62 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Edieal J. Pinker United States	21	729	548	362	328	314	67	1.6k
Retsef Levi United States	28	1.3k 1.7×	621 1.1×	382 1.1×	237 0.7×	264 0.8×	103	2.3k
Marcelo Olivares Chile	19	601 0.8×	322 0.6×	548 1.5×	389 1.2×	252 0.8×	44	1.5k
Sergei Savin United States	20	631 0.9×	474 0.9×	332 0.9×	664 2.0×	247 0.8×	50	1.9k
Gad Allon United States	21	980 1.3×	374 0.7×	603 1.7×	316 1.0×	427 1.4×	64	1.8k
Achal Bassamboo United States	24	1.2k 1.7×	473 0.9×	435 1.2×	169 0.5×	398 1.3×	69	2.0k
Kenneth L. Schultz United States	14	825 1.1×	361 0.7×	246 0.7×	140 0.4×	446 1.4×	17	1.5k
Vivek F. Farias United States	22	687 0.9×	672 1.2×	537 1.5×	371 1.1×	115 0.4×	50	2.0k
Mor Armony United States	22	1.5k 2.1×	342 0.6×	200 0.6×	224 0.7×	107 0.3×	40	2.1k
Robert A. Shumsky United States	18	800 1.1×	269 0.5×	304 0.8×	244 0.7×	209 0.7×	45	1.4k
Kurt M. Bretthauer United States	22	377 0.5×	274 0.5×	358 1.0×	174 0.5×	128 0.4×	50	1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Edieal J. Pinker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edieal J. Pinker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edieal J. Pinker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edieal J. Pinker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edieal J. Pinker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edieal J. Pinker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edieal J. Pinker. The network helps show where Edieal J. Pinker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edieal J. Pinker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edieal J. Pinker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edieal J. Pinker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edieal J. Pinker. Edieal J. Pinker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Kaplan, Edward H., et al.. (2024). Optimal evaluation policies to identify students with reading disabilities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 98. 102116–102116.

Sangal, Rohit B., et al.. (2024). Emergency Department Boarding: Quantifying the Impact of ED Boarding on Patient Outcomes and Downstream Hospital Operations. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Pinker, Edieal J., et al.. (2023). Inequities among patient placement in emergency department hallway treatment spaces. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 76. 70–74. 5 indexed citations

Sangal, Rohit B., Hazar Khidir, Vivek Parwani, et al.. (2023). Sociodemographic Disparities in Queue Jumping for Emergency Department Care. JAMA Network Open. 6(7). e2326338–e2326338. 12 indexed citations

Kurth, Ann, et al.. (2021). Critical Care Nursing. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 51(3). E6–E12. 4 indexed citations

Adelson, Kerin B., et al.. (2017). Development of Imminent Mortality Predictor for Advanced Cancer (IMPAC), a Tool to Predict Short-Term Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Advanced Cancer. Journal of Oncology Practice. 14(3). e168–e175. 17 indexed citations

Perkins, Michael W., Melissa P. Knauert, Shyoko Honiden, et al.. (2017). Rothman Index Predicts ICU Mortality at 24 Hours. CHEST Journal. 152(4). A332–A332. 1 indexed citations

Pinker, Edieal J., et al.. (2017). Dynamic Relational Contracts for Quality Enforcement in Supply Chains. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Dobson, Gregory, et al.. (2016). An EOQ model for perishable goods with age-dependent demand rate. European Journal of Operational Research. 257(1). 84–88. 77 indexed citations

10.

Pinker, Edieal J.. (2015). Introduction to the OR Forum Article: “Tenure Analytics: Models for Predicting Research Impact”. Operations Research. 63(6). 1245–1245. 2 indexed citations

11.

Pinker, Edieal J. & Tolga Tezcan. (2013). Determining the Optimal Configuration of Hospital Inpatient Rooms in the Presence of Isolation Patients. Operations Research. 61(6). 1259–1276. 18 indexed citations

12.

Pinker, Edieal J., Joseph Szmerekovsky, & Vera Tilson. (2011). Managing a Secret Project. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

13.

Pinker, Edieal J., Abraham Seidmann, & Yaniv Vakrat. (2009). Using bid data for the management of sequential, multi-unit, online auctions with uniformly distributed bidder valuations. European Journal of Operational Research. 202(2). 574–583. 36 indexed citations

14.

Hasija, Sameer, Edieal J. Pinker, & Robert A. Shumsky. (2007). Call Center Outsourcing Under Information Asymmetry. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

15.

Vakrat, Yaniv, Edieal J. Pinker, & Abraham Seidmann. (2003). Managing Online Auctions:Current Business and Research Issues.: Current Business and Research Issues.. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 49(11). 1457–34. 2 indexed citations

16.

Pinker, Edieal J., Abraham Seidmann, & Yaniv Vakrat. (2003). Managing Online Auctions: Current Business and Research Issues. Management Science. 49(11). 1457–1484. 246 indexed citations

17.

Shumsky, Robert A. & Edieal J. Pinker. (2002). Gatekeepers and Referrals in Services. SSRN Electronic Journal. 8 indexed citations

18.

Pinker, Edieal J. & Richard C. Larson. (2002). Optimizing the use of contingent labor when demand is uncertain. European Journal of Operational Research. 144(1). 39–55. 66 indexed citations

19.

Pinker, Edieal J. & Robert A. Shumsky. (2000). The Efficiency-Quality Trade-Off of Cross-Trained Workers. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 2(1). 32–48. 110 indexed citations

20.

Pinker, Edieal J. & Robert A. Shumsky. (1998). The Efficiency-Quality Tradeoff of Cross-Trained Workers. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact