Douglas Bruster
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 12
-
- Theatre and Performance Studies 2
- Museology top 10%
- Historical Art and Culture Studies 3
- Classics top 10%
- Renaissance Literature and Culture 4
- History top 10%
-
- Philippine History and Culture 3
-
- Linguistic Variation and Morphology 2
-
- Authorship Attribution and Profiling 2
-
- Irish and British Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Robert WeimannG.K. SmithEric Rasmussen
- Journals
- Shakespeare Quarterly (3 papers)Notes and Queries (1 paper)Philological quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Douglas Bruster
16 papers receiving 72 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Literature and Literary Theory 71
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 22
- Museology 15
- Classics 14
- History 26
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Bruster
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Bruster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Bruster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Bruster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Bruster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Bruster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Bruster. The network helps show where Douglas Bruster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Douglas Bruster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 2 | Wordplay in Earliest Shakespeare | 2017 | 0 |
| 3 | Shakespeare and the Question of Culture: Early Modern Literature and the Cultural Turn | 2017 | 3 |
| 4 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 8 | Everyman and Mankind | 2009 | 1 |
| 9 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 10 | In the company of Shakespeare : essays on English Renaissance literature in honor of G. Blakemore Evans | 2004 | 6 |
| 11 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 12 | Prologues to Shakespeare's Theatre: Performance and Liminality in Early Modern Drama | 2004 | 8 |
| 13 | 2003 | 16 | |
| 14 | Quoting Shakespeare: Form and Culture in Early Modern Drama | 2000 | 14 |
| 15 | 2000 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1992 | 27 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 3 | |
| 19 | Come to the Tent Again: "The Passionate Shepherd," Dramatic Rape and Lyric Time | 1991 | 5 |
| 20 | 1990 | 1 |
About Douglas Bruster
Douglas Bruster is a scholar working on Classics, Literature and Literary Theory and Museology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 126 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (12 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (4 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (3 papers), Philippine History and Culture (3 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (2 papers), Theatre and Performance Studies (2 papers), Authorship Attribution and Profiling (2 papers) and Irish and British Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (71 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (22 citations) and Museology (15 citations). Douglas Bruster has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Weimann, G.K. Smith and Eric Rasmussen. Their work appears in journals such as Shakespeare Quarterly, Notes and Queries, Philological quarterly, Exemplaria and Renaissance Drama.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.