Douglas M. Lanier
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- Museology top 5%
- Topics
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (9 papers)Historical Art and Culture Studies (5 papers)Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
Douglas M. Lanier
8 papers receiving 60 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Literature and Literary Theory 79
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 24
- Sociology and Political Science 20
- Economics and Econometrics 19
- Museology 17
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas M. Lanier
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas M. Lanier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas M. Lanier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas M. Lanier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas M. Lanier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas M. Lanier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas M. Lanier. The network helps show where Douglas M. Lanier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas M. Lanier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas M. Lanier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas M. Lanier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas M. Lanier. Douglas M. Lanier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Recent Shakespearean Adaptation and the Mutations of Cultural Capital | 10 |
| 7 | Will of the People: Recent Shakespeare Film Parody and the Politics of Popularization | 3 |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | Minstrelsy, Jazz, Rap: Shakespeare, African American Music, and Cultural Legitimation | 0 |
| 10 | Nostalgia and Theatricality: The Fate of the Shakespearean Stage in The Midsummer Night'sDreams of Michael Hoffman, Adrian Noble, and Christine Edzard | 0 |
| 11 | Art thou base, common and popular?'": The Cultural Politics of Kenneth Branagh's Hamlet | 0 |
| 12 | 59 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | Masculine Silence: Epicoene and Jonsonian Stylistics | 5 |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | Less is More: Coverage, Critical Theory and the Limits of Pluralism in Introductory Literature Courses | 1 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Douglas M. Lanier
Douglas M. Lanier is a scholar working on Museology, Literature and Literary Theory and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 21 papers that have together received 103 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (9 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (5 papers) and Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (79 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (24 citations) and Museology (17 citations). Douglas M. Lanier has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Jean E. Howard, Emma Smith, Dympna Callaghan, Laurie Maguire, Frances E. Dolan and Catherine Belsey. Their work appears in journals such as Shakespeare Quarterly, English Literary Renaissance and Studies in English Literature 1500-1900.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.