Doug Mahar
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
-
- Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Papers in
-
- Aging and Gerontology Research 4
-
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 6
- Co-authors
- Rachel GrieveRon HendersonFrank P. DeaneVesna PopovićKate BarrelleKate E. MulgrewAlethea BlacklerAnthony D. G. Marks
- Journals
- Personality and Individual Differences (4 papers)Interacting with Computers (3 papers)Perception (2 papers)International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2 papers)Climatic Change (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaNew ZealandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Doug Mahar
29 papers receiving 568 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Human-Computer Interaction 66
- Information Systems and Management 62
- Clinical Psychology 164
- Gender Studies 70
- Applied Psychology 36
Countries citing papers authored by Doug Mahar
This map shows the geographic impact of Doug Mahar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doug Mahar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doug Mahar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Doug Mahar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doug Mahar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doug Mahar. The network helps show where Doug Mahar may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Doug Mahar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 5 | Methodological issues with older users as research participants | 2015 | 1 |
| 6 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 77 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 11 | Intuitive interaction, prior experience and aging: An empirical study | 2009 | 11 |
| 12 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 24 | |
| 14 | The psychophysics of tactile amplitude summation: a test of the nGamma nonlinear model. | 2005 | 0 |
| 15 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 19 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 12 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 43 | |
| 20 | 1994 | 19 |
About Doug Mahar
Doug Mahar is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, Demography, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 619 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Use by Older Adults (6 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (6 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (4 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (3 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (66 citations), Information Systems and Management (62 citations), Clinical Psychology (164 citations), Gender Studies (70 citations) and Applied Psychology (36 citations). Doug Mahar has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Grieve, Ron Henderson, Frank P. Deane, Vesna Popović, Kate Barrelle, Kate E. Mulgrew, Alethea Blackler, Anthony D. G. Marks, Bridie Scott‐Parker and Patrick D. Nunn. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Interacting with Computers, Perception, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies and Climatic Change.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.