Doris S. Mok
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Communication top 1%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Co-authors
- John W. BerryUichol KimDiana M. ElliottJohn BriereEsther Yuet Ying LauShu Fai CheungC. Harry HuiMark Lawrence Wong
- Topics
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers)Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers)Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- MacaoHong KongUnited States
In The Last Decade
Doris S. Mok
15 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Sociology and Political Science 1.2k
- Clinical Psychology 927
- Social Psychology 564
- Communication 400
- General Health Professions 355
Countries citing papers authored by Doris S. Mok
This map shows the geographic impact of Doris S. Mok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doris S. Mok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doris S. Mok more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Doris S. Mok
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doris S. Mok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doris S. Mok. The network helps show where Doris S. Mok may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Doris S. Mok
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Doris S. Mok. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Doris S. Mok based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Doris S. Mok. Doris S. Mok is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | An Integrative Body-Mind-Spirit Intervention Program for Enhancing Holistic Well-Being of Young People in Emerging Adulthood | 1 |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 46 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 182 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 316 | |
| 12 | Multiple/Dual Relationships in Counseling: Implications for the Asian Context | 3 |
| 13 | 124 | |
| 14 | Comparative Studies of Acculturative Stressbreakdown → | 1117 |
| 15 | Comparative Studies of Acculturative Stressbreakdown → | 510 |
About Doris S. Mok
Doris S. Mok is a scholar working on Health, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (400 citations), Clinical Psychology (927 citations) and Health (317 citations). Doris S. Mok has collaborated with scholars based in Macao, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include John W. Berry, Uichol Kim, Diana M. Elliott, John Briere, Esther Yuet Ying Lau, Shu Fai Cheung, C. Harry Hui, Mark Lawrence Wong, Tutis Vilis and W Cadera. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and Journal of Traumatic Stress.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.