Doris Mayer

1.5k citations
20 papers · 1.0k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Doris Mayer

19 papers receiving 976 citations

Peers

Doris Mayer
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Applied Psychology 541
  • General Decision Sciences 85
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 343
  • Social Psychology 422
  • Clinical Psychology 172
Replace A. Timur Sevincer with:
A. Timur Sevincer Germany
Ann H. Baumgardner United States
Brandon D. Stewart United States
Olesya Govorun United States
Katharina Bernecker Switzerland
Kaitlyn M. Werner Canada
Patrick J. Carroll United States
Chin Ming Hui Hong Kong
Lisa K. Libby United States
Scott H. Hemenover United States
Doris Mayer relative to A. Timur Sevincer Germany A. Timur Sevincer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
A. Timur Sevincer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Doris Mayer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Doris Mayer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doris Mayer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doris Mayer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Doris Mayer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doris Mayer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doris Mayer. The network helps show where Doris Mayer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Doris Mayer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Doris Mayer Line = papers co-authored together Doris Mayer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2002358
2 2009154
3 200581
4 200952
5 201849
6 201646
7 201146
8 196645
9 201140
10 201040
11 201139
12 201225
13 201124
14 201023
15 197013
16 19713
17 19693
18 19723
19 19752
20 19620

About Doris Mayer

Doris Mayer is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (10 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (7 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (4 papers), Mind wandering and attention (2 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (1 paper) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (541 citations), General Decision Sciences (85 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (343 citations), Social Psychology (422 citations) and Clinical Psychology (172 citations). Doris Mayer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Gabriele Oettingen, Elizabeth J. Stephens, Jennifer Thorpe, A. Timur Sevincer, Meyer Fortes, Heather Barry Kappes, Kim Berg Johannessen, Peter M. Gollwitzer, Teri A. Kirby and Anton Gollwitzer. Their work appears in journals such as Motivation and Emotion, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Psychology and Health, Journal of Personnel Psychology and Psychological Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact