Donna Chung
- Health top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Co-authors
- Ed CarsonJan BreckenridgeCarole ZuffereyNicola Sharp-JeffsJudy L. PostmusGretchen L. HogePatrick O’LearyAndrew Day
- Topics
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence (33 papers)Homelessness and Social Issues (17 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (9 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONENeurologyBMC Public Health
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Donna Chung
60 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Health 518
- Sociology and Political Science 432
- General Health Professions 330
- Clinical Psychology 276
- Gender Studies 215
Countries citing papers authored by Donna Chung
This map shows the geographic impact of Donna Chung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donna Chung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donna Chung more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Donna Chung
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donna Chung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donna Chung. The network helps show where Donna Chung may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donna Chung
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donna Chung. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donna Chung based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Donna Chung. Donna Chung is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | Having the violence leave: A choice or a right? | 1 |
| 14 | 49 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | Integrated Responses to Domestic Violence: Research and Practice Experiences in Working with Men | 6 |
| 17 | Representations of Homelessness in the Australian Print Media: Some Implications for Social Policy | 10 |
| 18 | Feminists Researching Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programs: Improving Women's and Children's Safety or Misplaced Effort? | 4 |
| 19 | Questioning Domestic Violence Orthodoxies: Challenging the Social Construction of Women as Victims and as Being Responsible for Stopping Male Violence | 5 |
| 20 | Gender Politics and Research: Male and Female Violence in Intimate Relationships | 8 |
About Donna Chung
Donna Chung is a scholar working on Health, Public Administration and Gender Studies, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (33 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (17 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (518 citations), Gender Studies (215 citations) and Public Administration (55 citations). Donna Chung has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Ed Carson, Jan Breckenridge, Carole Zufferey, Nicola Sharp-Jeffs, Judy L. Postmus, Gretchen L. Hoge, Patrick O’Leary, Andrew Day, Reinie Cordier and Renée Speyer. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Neurology and BMC Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.