Adam Gerace
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Eimear Muir‐CochraneAndrew DayCandice OsterPhilip MohrSharon CaseyDeb O’KaneKevin HowellsSuzanne Dawson
- Topics
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (14 papers)Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (12 papers)Psychiatric care and mental health services (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomAustria
In The Last Decade
Adam Gerace
54 papers receiving 982 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Clinical Psychology 645
- Sociology and Political Science 252
- General Health Professions 247
- Social Psychology 232
- Psychiatry and Mental health 121
Countries citing papers authored by Adam Gerace
This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Gerace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Gerace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Gerace more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Gerace
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Gerace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Gerace. The network helps show where Adam Gerace may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam Gerace
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam Gerace. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam Gerace based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam Gerace. Adam Gerace is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | Understanding the needs of female prisoners in South Australia | 0 |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | Hold my hand and walk with me: Empathy on the mental health inpatient unit. | 2 |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | Criminal rehabilitation : the impact of religious programming | 10 |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Adam Gerace
Adam Gerace is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Health, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (14 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (12 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (645 citations), Research and Theory (12 citations) and Health (103 citations). Adam Gerace has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Eimear Muir‐Cochrane, Andrew Day, Candice Oster, Philip Mohr, Sharon Casey, Deb O’Kane, Kevin Howells, Suzanne Dawson, Julia Jones and Gabrielle Rigney. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Personality and Individual Differences and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.