Katrin Cremers

622 total citations
10 papers, 345 citations indexed

About

Katrin Cremers is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Economics and Econometrics and Accounting. According to data from OpenAlex, Katrin Cremers has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 345 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 8 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 3 papers in Accounting. Recurrent topics in Katrin Cremers's work include Intellectual Property and Patents (9 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (7 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (3 papers). Katrin Cremers is often cited by papers focused on Intellectual Property and Patents (9 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (7 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (3 papers). Katrin Cremers collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Katrin Cremers's co-authors include Knut Blind, Elisabeth Mueller, Fabian Gaessler, Dietmar Harhoff, Christian Helmers, Nicolas van Zeebroeck, Luke McDonagh, Yassine Lefouili, Christian Rammer and Jürgen Egeln and has published in prestigious journals such as Research Policy, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization and The Journal of Technology Transfer.

In The Last Decade

Katrin Cremers

10 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Katrin Cremers Germany 6 276 266 107 58 13 10 345
Ted M. Sichelman United States 7 195 0.7× 197 0.7× 52 0.5× 93 1.6× 24 1.8× 31 297
Jeffrey M. Kuhn United States 8 223 0.8× 237 0.9× 65 0.6× 42 0.7× 4 0.3× 15 331
Tim Pohlmann Germany 8 211 0.8× 216 0.8× 119 1.1× 43 0.7× 13 1.0× 20 305
Ryan Lampe United States 7 199 0.7× 200 0.8× 83 0.8× 30 0.5× 58 4.5× 19 301
Ann-Charlotte Fridh Sweden 2 187 0.7× 173 0.7× 126 1.2× 36 0.6× 5 0.4× 3 271
Amanda Myers United States 8 182 0.7× 142 0.5× 51 0.5× 57 1.0× 17 1.3× 11 242
Z. A. Silberston United Kingdom 2 273 1.0× 249 0.9× 116 1.1× 42 0.7× 9 0.7× 2 352
Kevin Tseng Taiwan 10 114 0.4× 34 0.1× 85 0.8× 163 2.8× 12 0.9× 32 290
Theon van Dijk Netherlands 7 138 0.5× 51 0.2× 121 1.1× 15 0.3× 25 1.9× 19 244
Katleen Baeyens Belgium 5 124 0.4× 84 0.3× 45 0.4× 193 3.3× 3 0.2× 5 269

Countries citing papers authored by Katrin Cremers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katrin Cremers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katrin Cremers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katrin Cremers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katrin Cremers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katrin Cremers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katrin Cremers. The network helps show where Katrin Cremers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katrin Cremers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katrin Cremers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katrin Cremers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katrin Cremers. Katrin Cremers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Cremers, Katrin, Fabian Gaessler, Dietmar Harhoff, et al.. (2016). Patent litigation in Europe. European Journal of Law and Economics. 44(1). 1–44. 33 indexed citations
2.
Cremers, Katrin, Fabian Gaessler, Dietmar Harhoff, Christian Helmers, & Yassine Lefouili. (2016). Invalid but infringed? An analysis of the bifurcated patent litigation system. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 131. 218–242. 18 indexed citations
3.
Cremers, Katrin, Fabian Gaessler, Dietmar Harhoff, & Christian Helmers. (2014). Invalid But Infringed? An Analysis of Germany's Bifurcated Patent Litigation System. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations
4.
Cremers, Katrin, et al.. (2014). Patent litigation settlement in Germany: why parties settle during trial. European Journal of Law and Economics. 40(2). 185–208. 15 indexed citations
5.
Cremers, Katrin, Fabian Gaessler, Dietmar Harhoff, & Christian Helmers. (2014). Invalid but Infringed? An Analysis of Germany's Bifurcated Patent Litigation System. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
6.
Cremers, Katrin, et al.. (2012). Patent Litigation Settlement in Germany - Why Parties Settle During Trial. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
7.
Polt, Wolfgang, Martin Berger, Katrin Cremers, et al.. (2010). Das deutsche Forschungs- und Innovationssystem: Ein internationaler Sytemvergleich zur Rolle von Wissenschaft, Interaktionen und Governance für die technologische Leistungsfähigkeit. Econstor (Econstor). 1 indexed citations
8.
Blind, Knut, Katrin Cremers, & Elisabeth Mueller. (2009). The influence of strategic patenting on companies’ patent portfolios. Research Policy. 38(2). 428–436. 215 indexed citations
9.
Cremers, Katrin. (2007). Settlement during patent litigation trials. An empirical analysis for Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 34(2). 182–195. 35 indexed citations
10.
Cremers, Katrin. (2004). Determinants of Patent Litigation in Germany. SSRN Electronic Journal. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026