This map shows the geographic impact of Georg Licht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Georg Licht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Georg Licht more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Georg Licht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Georg Licht. The network helps show where Georg Licht may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Georg Licht
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Georg Licht.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Georg Licht based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Georg Licht. Georg Licht is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Botelho, Tiago, et al.. (2017). Understanding the nature and impact of the business angels in funding research and innovation: Final report. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.
6.
Ács, Zoltán J., David B. Audretsch, Erik E. Lehmann, & Georg Licht. (2016). National systems of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics. 46(4). 527–535.117 indexed citations
7.
Licht, Georg & Bettina Peters. (2014). Do Green Innovations Stimulate Employment? Firm-level Evidence From Germany. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 53. WIFO Studies.1 indexed citations
8.
Bertschek, Irene, Holger Bonin, Jürgen Egeln, et al.. (2013). Herausforderungen für die deutsche Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik in der Legislaturperiode 2013-2017. Econstor (Econstor).
9.
Licht, Georg & Bettina Peters. (2013). The Impact of Green Innovation on Employment Growth in Europe. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 50. WIFO Studies.3 indexed citations
10.
Peters, Bettina, et al.. (2009). Soziale Erträge der FuE-Tätigkeit in Deutschland: Endbericht. Econstor (Econstor).1 indexed citations
11.
Heger, Diana, et al.. (2009). Die volkswirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Familienunternehmen. MADOC (University of Mannheim).16 indexed citations
Cowling, Marc, Helmut Fryges, Georg Licht, & Gordon Murray. (2007). The survival and growth of 'adolescent' high-tech firms in Germany and the UK, 1997-2003. Econstor (Econstor).3 indexed citations
14.
Cowling, Marc, et al.. (2006). Survival of New Technology Based Firms in the UK and Germany. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).4 indexed citations
15.
Büttner, Thiess, Thomas Cleff, Jürgen Egeln, et al.. (2004). Innovationsbarrieren und internationale Standortmobilität: Eine Studie im Auftrag der IG BCE, Chemieverbände Rheinland-Pfalz und der BASF Aktiengesellschaft. Econstor (Econstor).1 indexed citations
16.
Czarnitzki, Dirk, Georg Licht, Christian Rammer, & Alfred Spielkamp. (2001). Rolle und Bedeutung von Intermediären in Wissens- und Technologietransfer. Econstor (Econstor). 54(4). 40–49.3 indexed citations
Kleinknecht, Alfred, et al.. (1998). The impact of innovation on employment in Europe - an analysis using CIS data. Econstor (Econstor).21 indexed citations
19.
Licht, Georg & Harald Stahl. (1996). Ergebnisse der Innovationserhebung 1995. MADOC (University of Mannheim).2 indexed citations
20.
Harhoff, Dietmar, et al.. (1994). Innovationsverhalten der deutschen Wirtschaft. Ergebnisse der Innovationserhebung 1993. Econstor (Econstor).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.