Diane M. Mackie
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.05%
- Social Psychology top 0.1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Applied Psychology top 0.2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Eliot R. SmithLeila T. WorthThierry DevosDavid L. HamiltonDavid M. MessickCharles R. SegerArlene G. AsuncionTeresa Garcia‐Marques
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (94 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (59 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPortugalUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Diane M. Mackie
142 papers receiving 9.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Sociology and Political Science 6.3k
- Social Psychology 4.7k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.7k
- Applied Psychology 1.3k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.0k
Countries citing papers authored by Diane M. Mackie
This map shows the geographic impact of Diane M. Mackie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane M. Mackie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane M. Mackie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diane M. Mackie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane M. Mackie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane M. Mackie. The network helps show where Diane M. Mackie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diane M. Mackie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diane M. Mackie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diane M. Mackie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diane M. Mackie. Diane M. Mackie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 39 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 57 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 57 | |
| 8 | 181 | |
| 9 | 75 | |
| 10 | 451 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 56 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception.breakdown → | 550 |
| 15 | 139 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 65 | |
| 18 | 394 | |
| 19 | 198 | |
| 20 | Gender and Computers: Two Computer-Related Attitudes 1 | 1 |
About Diane M. Mackie
Diane M. Mackie is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Social Psychology, having authored 145 papers that have together received 10.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (94 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (59 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (1.3k citations), Social Psychology (4.7k citations) and General Decision Sciences (418 citations). Diane M. Mackie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Portugal and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Eliot R. Smith, Leila T. Worth, Thierry Devos, David L. Hamilton, David M. Messick, Charles R. Seger, Arlene G. Asuncion, Teresa Garcia‐Marques, Robert J. Rydell and Joel Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychological Review and Psychological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.