Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic.
1991945 citationsNorbert Schwarz, Herbert Bless et al.Journal of Personality and Social Psychologyprofile →
Mood and Persuasion
1990504 citationsHerbert Bless, Gerd Bohner et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Herbert Bless's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herbert Bless with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herbert Bless more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herbert Bless. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herbert Bless. The network helps show where Herbert Bless may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Herbert Bless
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Herbert Bless.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Herbert Bless based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Herbert Bless. Herbert Bless is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kemmelmeier, Markus, Herbert Bless, Norbert Schwarz, & Gerd Bohner. (2004). What research participants learn from rewards: A conversational logic analysis of rewarding reasoning performance. PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University). 22(2). 267–287.3 indexed citations
Bless, Herbert & Carolyn Yoon. (2002). Processes Underlying Direction and Magnitude of Context Effects: Advances in Theory and Implications for Consumer Settings. Advances in consumer research. 29(1). 86.
12.
Wänke, Michaela, Herbert Bless, & Norbert Schwarz. (1999). Assimilation and Contrast in Brand and Product Evaluations: Implications For Marketing. ACR North American Advances.7 indexed citations
Bless, Herbert, et al.. (1994). Need for cognition: eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben: Need for cognition: a scale measuring engagement and happiness in cognitive tasks. PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University). 25.116 indexed citations
16.
Bless, Herbert, et al.. (1994). Need for Cognition : eine Skala zur Erfassung von Freude und Engagement bei Denkaufgaben.6 indexed citations
17.
Bless, Herbert, Gerd Bohner, & Norbert Schwarz. (1992). Gut gelaunt und leicht beeinflussbar? Stimmungseinflüsse auf die Verarbeitung persuasiver Kommunikation. Psychologische Rundschau. 43(1). 1–17.3 indexed citations
18.
Schwarz, Norbert & Herbert Bless. (1992). Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Attitude Measurement: an Inclusion/Exclusion Model. ACR North American Advances.25 indexed citations
Bless, Herbert, et al.. (1991). Need for cognition: eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 17.49 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.