Diana Selmeczy

575 total citations
22 papers, 351 citations indexed

About

Diana Selmeczy is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana Selmeczy has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 351 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 7 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 5 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Diana Selmeczy's work include Memory Processes and Influences (12 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers). Diana Selmeczy is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (12 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers). Diana Selmeczy collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Germany. Diana Selmeczy's co-authors include Ian G. Dobbins, Simona Ghetti, Kali H. Trzesniewski, Tenelle Porter, Karina Schumann, Kevin J. Grimm, Antônio Jaeger, Yana Fandakova, Silvia A. Bunge and Julie M. Bugg and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Child Development and Developmental Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Diana Selmeczy

21 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Diana Selmeczy United States 11 218 109 100 71 39 22 351
Nai‐Shing Yen Taiwan 11 244 1.1× 132 1.2× 85 0.8× 93 1.3× 22 0.6× 34 385
Adrienne Wente United States 6 75 0.3× 115 1.1× 72 0.7× 63 0.9× 48 1.2× 7 268
Mika Asaba United States 7 93 0.4× 111 1.0× 80 0.8× 37 0.5× 34 0.9× 20 215
Shari Liu United States 9 219 1.0× 259 2.4× 190 1.9× 90 1.3× 69 1.8× 23 490
Matthew Moreno Canada 6 229 1.1× 93 0.9× 137 1.4× 106 1.5× 49 1.3× 17 456
Francesca Pesciarelli Italy 15 354 1.6× 126 1.2× 67 0.7× 181 2.5× 38 1.0× 32 527
Emma Blakey United Kingdom 11 207 0.9× 122 1.1× 84 0.8× 182 2.6× 28 0.7× 20 477
Lacy E. Krueger United States 6 232 1.1× 87 0.8× 49 0.5× 78 1.1× 22 0.6× 15 377
Rosie Aboody United States 6 70 0.3× 130 1.2× 63 0.6× 61 0.9× 69 1.8× 18 292
Janani Prabhakar United States 9 137 0.6× 186 1.7× 33 0.3× 103 1.5× 32 0.8× 14 290

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Selmeczy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Selmeczy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Selmeczy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Selmeczy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Selmeczy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Selmeczy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Selmeczy. The network helps show where Diana Selmeczy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Selmeczy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Selmeczy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Selmeczy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Selmeczy. Diana Selmeczy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gonzales, Christopher R., et al.. (2024). Toddlers' visual exploration during decisions predicts uncertainty monitoring 1 year later. Child Development. 96(1). 312–324.
2.
Selmeczy, Diana, et al.. (2023). Active help-seeking and metacognition interact in supporting children’s retention of science facts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 237. 105772–105772. 1 indexed citations
3.
Selmeczy, Diana, et al.. (2023). Developmental differences in value-based remembering: The role of feedback and metacognition.. Developmental Psychology. 59(7). 1181–1189. 4 indexed citations
4.
Selmeczy, Diana, Simona Ghetti, Lucy Zheng, Tenelle Porter, & Kali H. Trzesniewski. (2021). Help me understand: Adaptive information-seeking predicts academic achievement in school-aged children. Cognitive Development. 59. 101062–101062. 8 indexed citations
5.
Selmeczy, Diana, et al.. (2021). Developmental Differences in Subjective Recollection and Its Role in Decision Making. Child Development. 92(6). e1308–e1325. 4 indexed citations
6.
Jaeger, Antônio, et al.. (2020). Source retrieval under cueing: Dissociated effects on accuracy versus confidence.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 46(8). 1477–1493. 3 indexed citations
7.
Selmeczy, Diana, et al.. (2020). Response latencies and eye gaze provide insight on how toddlers gather evidence under uncertainty. Nature Human Behaviour. 4(9). 928–936. 22 indexed citations
8.
Porter, Tenelle, Karina Schumann, Diana Selmeczy, & Kali H. Trzesniewski. (2020). Intellectual humility predicts mastery behaviors when learning. Learning and Individual Differences. 80. 101888–101888. 61 indexed citations
9.
Jaeger, Antônio, et al.. (2019). Confidence Accuracy Dissociation During Source Memory Cueing. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations
10.
Selmeczy, Diana & Simona Ghetti. (2018). Here is a hint! How children integrate reliable recommendations in their memory decisions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 177. 222–239. 12 indexed citations
11.
Selmeczy, Diana, Yana Fandakova, Kevin J. Grimm, Silvia A. Bunge, & Simona Ghetti. (2018). Longitudinal trajectories of hippocampal and prefrontal contributions to episodic retrieval: Effects of age and puberty. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 36. 100599–100599. 26 indexed citations
12.
Selmeczy, Diana & Ian G. Dobbins. (2017). Ignoring memory hints: The stubborn influence of environmental cues on recognition memory.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 43(9). 1448–1469. 8 indexed citations
13.
Fandakova, Yana, Diana Selmeczy, Kevin J. Grimm, et al.. (2017). Changes in ventromedial prefrontal and insular cortex support the development of metamemory from childhood into adolescence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114(29). 7582–7587. 51 indexed citations
14.
Konkel, Alex, Diana Selmeczy, & Ian G. Dobbins. (2015). They can take a hint: Older adults effectively integrate memory cues during recognition.. Psychology and Aging. 30(4). 781–794. 10 indexed citations
15.
Bugg, Julie M., et al.. (2015). Expectations and experience: Dissociable bases for cognitive control?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 41(5). 1349–1373. 32 indexed citations
16.
Selmeczy, Diana & Ian G. Dobbins. (2013). Relating the content and confidence of recognition judgments.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 40(1). 66–85. 21 indexed citations
17.
Jaeger, Antônio, et al.. (2012). Prefrontal cortex contributions to controlled memory judgment: fMRI evidence from adolescents and young adults. Neuropsychologia. 50(14). 3745–3756. 10 indexed citations
18.
Selmeczy, Diana & Ian G. Dobbins. (2012). Metacognitive awareness and adaptive recognition biases.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 39(3). 678–690. 16 indexed citations
19.
Selmeczy, Diana, Kami Koldewyn, Aaron Lee, et al.. (2011). Investigation of amygdala volume in men with the fragile X premutation. Brain Imaging and Behavior. 5(4). 285–294. 5 indexed citations
20.
Jaeger, Antônio, et al.. (2011). The costs and benefits of memory conformity. Memory & Cognition. 40(1). 101–112. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026