Sergio Tenenbaum
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- War, Ethics, and Justification
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Free Will and Agency
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Papers in
- Philosophy 21
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 17
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 11
- War, Ethics, and Justification 2
- Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 2
-
- Free Will and Agency 9
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 3
- Journals
- Ethics (4 papers)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (3 papers)Inquiry (2 papers)Philosophical Explorations (2 papers)Noûs (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Sergio Tenenbaum
29 papers receiving 294 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Philosophy 269
- Cognitive Neuroscience 194
- General Decision Sciences 18
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 69
- History and Philosophy of Science 12
Countries citing papers authored by Sergio Tenenbaum
This map shows the geographic impact of Sergio Tenenbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sergio Tenenbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sergio Tenenbaum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sergio Tenenbaum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sergio Tenenbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sergio Tenenbaum. The network helps show where Sergio Tenenbaum may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Sergio Tenenbaum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 88 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 44 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 32 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 17 | Speculative Mistakes and Ordinary Temptations: Kant on Instrumentalist Conceptions of Practical Reason | 2003 | 4 |
| 18 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 4 |
About Sergio Tenenbaum
Sergio Tenenbaum is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (17 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers), Free Will and Agency (9 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (2 papers) and Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (269 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (194 citations), General Decision Sciences (18 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (69 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (12 citations). Sergio Tenenbaum has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Diana Raffman and Julia Nefsky. Their work appears in journals such as Ethics, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Inquiry, Philosophical Explorations and Noûs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.