Diana M. Zuckerman
- Health top 5%
- Health Informatics top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies 9
- Media, Gender, and Advertising 3
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies 5
-
- Breast Implant and Reconstruction 6
-
- Work-Family Balance Challenges 5
-
- Child Development and Digital Technology 5
- Higher Education Research Studies 3
-
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation 4
- Co-authors
- Stanislav V. KaslAdrian M. OstfeldSteven E. NissenP.J. BrownDorothy G. SingerJerome L. SingerNorma C. WareAnisha Abraham
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Diana M. Zuckerman
48 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
- Health 237
- Medical Laboratory Technology 32
- Health Informatics 24
- Gender Studies 159
- Clinical Psychology 331
Countries citing papers authored by Diana M. Zuckerman
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana M. Zuckerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana M. Zuckerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana M. Zuckerman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana M. Zuckerman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana M. Zuckerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana M. Zuckerman. The network helps show where Diana M. Zuckerman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diana M. Zuckerman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 5 | Understanding the Controversies Over a Groundbreaking New Health Care Law | 2015 | 2 |
| 6 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 173 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 39 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 28 | |
| 12 | Commentary: are breast implants safe? | 2001 | 0 |
| 13 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1985 | 21 | |
| 15 | 1984 | 243 | |
| 16 | 1982 | 11 | |
| 17 | Sex-Role Related Goals and Attitudes of Minority Students: A Study of Black College Women and Reentry Students. | 1981 | 5 |
| 18 | Changes and Contradictions in Children's Sex-Role Concepts. | 1980 | 1 |
| 19 | 1980 | 15 | |
| 20 | 1980 | 38 |
About Diana M. Zuckerman
Diana M. Zuckerman is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Health Informatics and Medical Laboratory Technology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Roles and Identity Studies (9 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (6 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (5 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (5 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (5 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (4 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (3 papers) and Media, Gender, and Advertising (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (237 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (32 citations) and Health Informatics (24 citations). Diana M. Zuckerman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stanislav V. Kasl, Adrian M. Ostfeld, Steven E. Nissen, P.J. Brown, Dorothy G. Singer, Jerome L. Singer, Norma C. Ware, Anisha Abraham, Barry Zuckerman and Myrna M. Weissman. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, American Psychologist and PEDIATRICS.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.