Diana Kuh

13.6k citations
172 papers · 8.6k indexed · h-index 51

Diana Kuh

169 papers receiving 8.3k citations

Peers

Diana Kuh
Comparison fields: 5 of 181
  • Health 1.4k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 431
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 157
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.8k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2.1k
Replace Merete Osler with:
Merete Osler Denmark
Julie Byles Australia
Rachel Cooper United Kingdom
Diana Kuh United Kingdom
Arun S. Karlamangla United States
Michael Wadsworth United Kingdom
Gita D. Mishra Australia
Martin J. Shipley United Kingdom
May A. Beydoun United States
Mary N. Haan United States
Diana Kuh relative to Merete Osler Denmark Merete Osler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Merete Osler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Kuh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Kuh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Kuh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Kuh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Kuh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Kuh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Kuh. The network helps show where Diana Kuh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diana Kuh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diana Kuh Line = papers co-authored together Diana Kuh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20203
2 20191
3 201816
4 201823
5 201821
6 20179
7 20169
8 2016273
9 201628
10 201437
11 201321
12 2013132
13 201344
14 201318
15
Why Should we Consider a Life Course Approach to Women’s Health Care?
20111
16 2011169
17 20087
18
Birthweight, childhood social class, and change in adult blood pressure in the 1946 British birth cohort (vol 362, pg 1178, 2003)
200524
19 200579
20
BIRTH WEIGHT IS RELATED TO HAND OSTEOARTHRITIS IN MIDDLE-AGED MEN
20021

About Diana Kuh

Diana Kuh is a scholar working on Health, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 172 papers that have together received 8.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Birth, Development, and Health (45 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (45 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (26 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (17 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (13 papers), Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (11 papers), Physical Activity and Health (10 papers) and Body Composition Measurement Techniques (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (1.4k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (431 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (157 citations). Diana Kuh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Hardy, Rachel Cooper, Yoav Ben‐Shlomo, Marcus Richards, Michael Wadsworth, Cyrus Cooper, Lindsay McLaren, Avan Aihie Sayer, Mai Stafford and Gita D. Mishra. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, PLoS ONE and American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026