Andrew Wong
Impact in
- Aging top 5%
-
- Birth, Development, and Health
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Rebecca HardyDiana KuhMarcus RichardsMartin WidschwendterAndrew E. TeschendorffDavid H. LedbetterNicholas J. WarehamRuth J. F. Loos
- Journals
- Translational Psychiatry (4 papers)Journal of Medical Genetics (3 papers)Neurobiology of Aging (3 papers)Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring (3 papers)Genome biology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Andrew Wong
107 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- Aging 86
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 683
- Genetics 862
- Health 215
- Physiology 661
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Wong
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Wong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Wong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Wong. The network helps show where Andrew Wong may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Wong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 47 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 57 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 34 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 319 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 19 | Detection of amyloid plaques in patients with post-stroke dementia. | 2016 | 7 |
| 20 | 1989 | 22 |
About Andrew Wong
Andrew Wong is a scholar working on Aging, Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Physiology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 114 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Birth, Development, and Health (15 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (12 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (10 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (8 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (8 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers) and Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (86 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (683 citations), Genetics (862 citations), Health (215 citations) and Physiology (661 citations). Andrew Wong has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Hardy, Diana Kuh, Marcus Richards, Diana Kuh, Martin Widschwendter, Andrew E. Teschendorff, David H. Ledbetter, Nicholas J. Wareham, Ruth J. F. Loos and Cathy E. Elks. Their work appears in journals such as Translational Psychiatry, Journal of Medical Genetics, Neurobiology of Aging, Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring and Genome biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.