Diana Floegel
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Communication top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Gender Studies
- Co-authors
- Kaitlin Light CostelloDafna LemishNelly EliasVanessa KitzieShannon M. OltmannLynn Silipigni ConnawayGary P. RadfordMarie L. Radford
- Topics
- Gender, Feminism, and Media (9 papers)Social Media and Politics (7 papers)Library Science and Administration (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of DocumentationLibrary & Information Science ResearchJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsIsrael
In The Last Decade
Diana Floegel
25 papers receiving 250 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Sociology and Political Science 168
- Education 103
- Communication 60
- Social Psychology 48
- Gender Studies 34
Countries citing papers authored by Diana Floegel
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Floegel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Floegel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Floegel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Floegel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Floegel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Floegel. The network helps show where Diana Floegel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Floegel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Floegel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Floegel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Floegel. Diana Floegel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | "Expanding on the Almost": Queer World-Building and Institutional Information Worlds | 3 |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 51 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 56 | |
| 18 | 31 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Diana Floegel
Diana Floegel is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Communication and Gender Studies, having authored 25 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (9 papers), Social Media and Politics (7 papers) and Library Science and Administration (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (20 citations), Communication (60 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (168 citations). Diana Floegel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Kaitlin Light Costello, Dafna Lemish, Nelly Elias, Vanessa Kitzie, Shannon M. Oltmann, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Gary P. Radford, Marie L. Radford, Chirag Shah and Travis L. Wagner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Documentation, Library & Information Science Research and Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.