Devra Cohen

477 total citations
10 papers, 376 citations indexed

About

Devra Cohen is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Devra Cohen has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 376 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 4 papers in Family Practice and 3 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Devra Cohen's work include Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers). Devra Cohen is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers). Devra Cohen collaborates with scholars based in United States. Devra Cohen's co-authors include Jerry A. Colliver, Mark H. Swartz, Randall Robbs, Ethan D. Fried, Rosamond Rhodes, Darren Shickle, Barry Stimmel, Sam Salek, Andrew Edgar and Karen Brown and has published in prestigious journals such as Academic Medicine, Medical Education and Advances in Health Sciences Education.

In The Last Decade

Devra Cohen

10 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Devra Cohen United States 10 227 171 125 92 44 10 376
Michel David France 5 235 1.0× 129 0.8× 91 0.7× 56 0.6× 12 0.3× 19 336
Karen Szauter United States 7 339 1.5× 144 0.8× 159 1.3× 135 1.5× 43 1.0× 19 423
Raphaël Bonvin Switzerland 12 192 0.8× 135 0.8× 89 0.7× 67 0.7× 67 1.5× 31 364
Sadia Malick United Kingdom 8 318 1.4× 154 0.9× 78 0.6× 40 0.4× 33 0.8× 10 517
Sandrina Schol Belgium 8 241 1.1× 208 1.2× 64 0.5× 179 1.9× 17 0.4× 13 358
Janet Lefroy United Kingdom 11 359 1.6× 111 0.6× 166 1.3× 43 0.5× 56 1.3× 29 466
J. A. A. M. van Diemen-Steenvoorde Netherlands 5 241 1.1× 94 0.5× 91 0.7× 68 0.7× 19 0.4× 8 326
Miriam Boillat Canada 8 243 1.1× 113 0.7× 50 0.4× 34 0.4× 14 0.3× 22 330
Judy L. Paukert United States 13 384 1.7× 121 0.7× 132 1.1× 24 0.3× 36 0.8× 17 471
Vimmi Passi United Kingdom 6 402 1.8× 223 1.3× 81 0.6× 144 1.6× 22 0.5× 8 490

Countries citing papers authored by Devra Cohen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Devra Cohen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Devra Cohen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Devra Cohen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Devra Cohen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Devra Cohen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Devra Cohen. The network helps show where Devra Cohen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Devra Cohen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Devra Cohen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Devra Cohen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Devra Cohen. Devra Cohen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Stimmel, Barry, Devra Cohen, Robert Fallar, & Lawrence J. Smith. (2006). The use of standardised patients to assess clinical competence: does practice make perfect?. Medical Education. 40(5). 444–449. 12 indexed citations
2.
McGovern, Margaret M., et al.. (2006). Use of Standardized Patients in, Undergraduate Medical Genetics Education. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 18(3). 203–207. 19 indexed citations
3.
Rhodes, Rosamond & Devra Cohen. (2003). Understanding, Being, and Doing: Medical Ethics in Medical Education. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 12(1). 39–53. 22 indexed citations
4.
Stimmel, Barry, et al.. (2000). An Assessment of House Staff's Knowledge of Alcohol and Substance Abuse Utilizing Standardized Patients. Substance Abuse. 21(1). 1–7. 14 indexed citations
5.
Colliver, Jerry A., Mark H. Swartz, Randall Robbs, & Devra Cohen. (1999). Relationship between clinical competence and interpersonal and communication skills in standardized-patient assessment. Academic Medicine. 74(3). 271–4. 60 indexed citations
6.
Edgar, Andrew, Sam Salek, Darren Shickle, & Devra Cohen. (1998). The Ethical QALY: Ethical Issues in Healthcare Resource Allocations. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 26 indexed citations
7.
Colliver, Jerry A., et al.. (1998). THE CONTINUED STUDY OF STANDARDIZED PATIENTS IN ASSESSMENT. Academic Medicine. 73(10). S81–83. 20 indexed citations
8.
Colliver, Jerry A., et al.. (1998). Assessment of Empathy in a Standardized-Patient Examination. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 10(1). 8–11. 77 indexed citations
9.
10.
Cohen, Devra, Jerry A. Colliver, Randall Robbs, & Mark H. Swartz. (1996). A large-scale study of the reliabilities of checklist scores and ratings of interpersonal and communication skills evaluated on a standardized-patient examination. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 1(3). 209–213. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026