Dena Goodman
Impact in
-
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
- Museology top 5%
- Historical Art and Culture Studies
Papers in
-
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis 10
- History of Science and Natural History 2
- History 14
- European Political History Analysis 11
- Co-authors
- Marie-France HilgarMaurice CranstonOrest RanumKathryn NorbergRamchandra RaoMalcolm CookJohn Christian LaursenJohn Brewer
- Journals
- French Historical Studies (4 papers)Eighteenth-Century Studies (4 papers)The American Historical Review (3 papers)History of European Ideas (3 papers)Representations (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Dena Goodman
22 papers receiving 206 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- History and Philosophy of Science 44
- Museology 31
- History 89
- Anthropology 49
- Philosophy 54
Countries citing papers authored by Dena Goodman
This map shows the geographic impact of Dena Goodman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dena Goodman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dena Goodman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dena Goodman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dena Goodman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dena Goodman. The network helps show where Dena Goodman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Dena Goodman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 4 | Marriage Calculations in the Eighteenth Century: Deconstructing the Love vs. Duty Binary | 2005 | 2 |
| 5 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 82 | |
| 8 | Shifting the Boundaries: Transformation of the Languages of Public and Private in the Eighteenth Century | 1995 | 9 |
| 9 | 1995 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 0 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 79 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 27 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1989 | 25 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1986 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1986 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1984 | 9 |
About Dena Goodman
Dena Goodman is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, History, Museology, Anthropology and Conservation, having authored 31 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European Political History Analysis (11 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (10 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (6 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (4 papers), Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), History of Science and Natural History (2 papers) and Historical and Literary Analyses (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (44 citations), Museology (31 citations), History (89 citations), Anthropology (49 citations) and Philosophy (54 citations). Dena Goodman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marie-France Hilgar, Maurice Cranston, Orest Ranum, Kathryn Norberg, Ramchandra Rao, Malcolm Cook, John Christian Laursen, John Brewer, Vivien Jones and Dale K. Van Kley. Their work appears in journals such as French Historical Studies, Eighteenth-Century Studies, The American Historical Review, History of European Ideas and Representations.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.