Jack R. Censer
- History top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Robert DarntonLydia G. CochraneRoger ChartierElizabeth ArmstrongJeremy D. PopkinIsser WolochLynn HuntHarriet Ritvo
- Topics
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (14 papers)European Political History Analysis (13 papers)French Historical and Cultural Studies (7 papers)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsThe American Historical ReviewThe Journal of Interdisciplinary History
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jack R. Censer
32 papers receiving 175 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- History 107
- Sociology and Political Science 76
- History and Philosophy of Science 73
- Political Science and International Relations 58
- Anthropology 52
Countries citing papers authored by Jack R. Censer
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack R. Censer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack R. Censer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack R. Censer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jack R. Censer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack R. Censer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack R. Censer. The network helps show where Jack R. Censer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jack R. Censer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jack R. Censer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jack R. Censer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jack R. Censer. Jack R. Censer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | Debating Modern Revolution: The Evolution of Revolutionary Ideas | 2 |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 85 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 47 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Jack R. Censer
Jack R. Censer is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, History and Museology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (14 papers), European Political History Analysis (13 papers) and French Historical and Cultural Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (73 citations), History (107 citations) and Anthropology (52 citations). Jack R. Censer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert Darnton, Lydia G. Cochrane, Roger Chartier, Elizabeth Armstrong, Jeremy D. Popkin, Isser Woloch, Lynn Hunt, Harriet Ritvo, Stephen Botein and François Sigaut. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The American Historical Review and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.