Delphine Picard

2.2k total citations
57 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Delphine Picard is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Automotive Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Delphine Picard has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 21 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 14 papers in Automotive Engineering. Recurrent topics in Delphine Picard's work include Tactile and Sensory Interactions (19 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (15 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (14 papers). Delphine Picard is often cited by papers focused on Tactile and Sensory Interactions (19 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (15 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (14 papers). Delphine Picard collaborates with scholars based in France, Switzerland and Morocco. Delphine Picard's co-authors include Agnès Giboreau, Camille Rioux, Jérémie Lafraire, Dominique Valentin, Catherine Dacremont, Christophe Jouffrais, Annie Vinter, Céline Scola, Thomas Arciszewski and Anke Brock and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Development, Personality and Individual Differences and Appetite.

In The Last Decade

Delphine Picard

55 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Delphine Picard
Harriet Oster United States
Nancy R. Gee United States
Valerie K. Sims United States
Carmel Houston‐Price United Kingdom
T. K. Pitcairn United Kingdom
Connor D. Richardson United Kingdom
Andy Woods United Kingdom
Mary M. Smyth United Kingdom
Kerstin Meints United Kingdom
Harriet Oster United States
Delphine Picard
Citations per year, relative to Delphine Picard Delphine Picard (= 1×) peers Harriet Oster

Countries citing papers authored by Delphine Picard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Delphine Picard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Delphine Picard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Delphine Picard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Delphine Picard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Delphine Picard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Delphine Picard. The network helps show where Delphine Picard may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Delphine Picard

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Delphine Picard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Delphine Picard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Delphine Picard. Delphine Picard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Baudouin, Jean‐Yves, et al.. (2024). Recognition of facial expressions of emotions in tactile drawings by blind children, children with low vision and sighted children. Acta Psychologica. 247. 104330–104330. 2 indexed citations
2.
Szubielska, Magdalena, et al.. (2023). Drawing as a tool for investigating the nature of imagery representations of blind people: The case of the canonical size phenomenon. Memory & Cognition. 53(1). 175–188. 1 indexed citations
3.
Rioux, Camille, Jérémie Lafraire, & Delphine Picard. (2017). Visual exposure and categorization performance positively influence 3- to 6-year-old children's willingness to taste unfamiliar vegetables. Appetite. 120. 32–42. 37 indexed citations
4.
Albaret, Jean‐Michel, et al.. (2017). The development of haptic processing skills from childhood to adulthood by means of two-dimensional materials.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 72(1). 48–57. 6 indexed citations
5.
Scola, Céline, et al.. (2016). Infants’ preference for prosocial behaviors: A literature review. Infant Behavior and Development. 45(Pt B). 125–139. 38 indexed citations
6.
Scola, Céline, et al.. (2015). Further Evidence for Infants' Preference for Prosocial Over Antisocial Behaviors. Infancy. 20(6). 684–692. 47 indexed citations
7.
Albaret, Jean‐Michel, et al.. (2015). Haptic-2D: A new haptic test battery assessing the tactual abilities of sighted and visually impaired children and adolescents with two-dimensional raised materials. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 48. 103–123. 19 indexed citations
8.
Lafraire, Jérémie, Camille Rioux, Agnès Giboreau, & Delphine Picard. (2015). Food rejections in children: Cognitive and social/environmental factors involved in food neophobia and picky/fussy eating behavior. Appetite. 96. 347–357. 188 indexed citations
9.
Picard, Delphine, et al.. (2014). Haptic identification of raised-line drawings when categorical information is given: A comparison between visually impaired and sighted children. Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México). 35(2). 277–290. 10 indexed citations
10.
Albaret, Jean‐Michel, et al.. (2014). Haptic Tests for Use with Children and Adults with Visual Impairments: A Literature Review. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness. 108(3). 227–237. 9 indexed citations
11.
Picard, Delphine, et al.. (2013). Leftward spatial bias in children's drawing placement: Hemispheric activation versus directional hypotheses. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition. 19(1). 96–112. 6 indexed citations
12.
Morizet, David, Laurence Depezay, Pierre Combris, Delphine Picard, & Agnès Giboreau. (2012). Effect of labeling on new vegetable dish acceptance in preadolescent children. Appetite. 59(2). 399–402. 32 indexed citations
13.
Rattat, Anne‐Claire & Delphine Picard. (2011). Short-term memory for auditory and visual durations: evidence for selective interference effects. Psychological Research. 76(1). 32–40. 20 indexed citations
14.
Picard, Delphine, et al.. (2010). Symbolic Use of Size and Color in Freehand Drawing of the Tree: Myth or Reality?. Journal of Personality Assessment. 92(2). 186–188. 19 indexed citations
15.
Picard, Delphine, et al.. (2008). How does Sam feel?: Children's labelling and drawing of basic emotions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 27(3). 587–606. 59 indexed citations
16.
Picard, Delphine, et al.. (2007). Expression des émotions dans le dessin d'un homme chez l'enfant de 5 à 11 ans.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 61(2). 142–153. 14 indexed citations
17.
Picard, Delphine & Annie Vinter. (2007). Relationships Between Procedural Rigidity and Interrepresentational Change in Children's Drawing Behavior. Child Development. 78(2). 522–541. 12 indexed citations
18.
Picard, Delphine. (2005). Partial perceptual equivalence between vision and touch for texture information. Acta Psychologica. 121(3). 227–248. 19 indexed citations
19.
Picard, Delphine, Catherine Dacremont, Dominique Valentin, & Agnès Giboreau. (2003). Perceptual dimensions of tactile textures. Acta Psychologica. 114(2). 165–184. 167 indexed citations
20.
Picard, Delphine & Olivier Jousson. (2001). Genetic variability among cecariae of the shistomatidae (Trematoda: Digenea) causing swimmer's itch in Europe. Parasite. 8(3). 237–242. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026