Céline Scola
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Sarah Le VigourouxJacques VauclairThomas ArciszewskiDelphine PicardMoïra MikolajczakMarie-Emilie RaesIsabelle RoskamMasako Myowa‐Yamakoshi
- Topics
- Child and Animal Learning Development (9 papers)Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (6 papers)Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Developmental and Educational PsychologySocial PsychologyRadiological and Ultrasound Technology
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPersonality and Individual Differences
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Céline Scola
18 papers receiving 437 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Social Psychology 183
- Clinical Psychology 179
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 156
- Cognitive Neuroscience 155
- Sociology and Political Science 83
Countries citing papers authored by Céline Scola
This map shows the geographic impact of Céline Scola's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Céline Scola with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Céline Scola more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Céline Scola
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Céline Scola. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Céline Scola. The network helps show where Céline Scola may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Céline Scola
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Céline Scola. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Céline Scola based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Céline Scola. Céline Scola is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 74 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 87 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 47 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 14 |
About Céline Scola
Céline Scola is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 454 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (9 papers), Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (6 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (156 citations), Social Psychology (183 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (45 citations). Céline Scola has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Le Vigouroux, Jacques Vauclair, Thomas Arciszewski, Delphine Picard, Moïra Mikolajczak, Marie-Emilie Raes, Isabelle Roskam, Masako Myowa‐Yamakoshi, Satoshi Hirata and Marianne Jover. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Personality and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.