Deil S. Wright

1.8k total citations
66 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Deil S. Wright is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Deil S. Wright has authored 66 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 23 papers in Public Administration and 9 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Deil S. Wright's work include Public Policy and Administration Research (22 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (17 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 papers). Deil S. Wright is often cited by papers focused on Public Policy and Administration Research (22 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (17 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 papers). Deil S. Wright collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and China. Deil S. Wright's co-authors include Jeffrey L. Brudney, F. Ted Hebert, Cynthia J. Bowling, Christine A. Kelleher, Nelson C. Dometrius, Jong Sup Jun, Peter J Haas, Jaewon Yoo, Morris Janowitz and Bruno Gander and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Administrative Science Quarterly and American Political Science Review.

In The Last Decade

Deil S. Wright

63 papers receiving 906 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Deil S. Wright United States 18 500 480 276 210 148 66 1.1k
John Bohte United States 13 327 0.7× 386 0.8× 254 0.9× 187 0.9× 169 1.1× 18 979
Donald J. Savoie Canada 18 710 1.4× 535 1.1× 394 1.4× 249 1.2× 224 1.5× 69 1.4k
Hindy Lauer Schachter United States 19 562 1.1× 373 0.8× 443 1.6× 91 0.4× 114 0.8× 81 1.2k
Linda Dickens United Kingdom 17 313 0.6× 573 1.2× 265 1.0× 67 0.3× 155 1.0× 49 1.2k
Russell D. Lansbury Australia 18 254 0.5× 435 0.9× 275 1.0× 105 0.5× 195 1.3× 135 986
Paul P. Van Riper United States 10 345 0.7× 353 0.7× 182 0.7× 149 0.7× 183 1.2× 34 814
James M. Ferris United States 15 371 0.7× 380 0.8× 518 1.9× 418 2.0× 285 1.9× 40 1.4k
Anna Pollert United Kingdom 19 506 1.0× 618 1.3× 611 2.2× 224 1.1× 154 1.0× 46 1.6k
Daniel J. B. Mitchell United States 20 189 0.4× 520 1.1× 293 1.1× 519 2.5× 223 1.5× 125 1.3k
Sanford M. Jacoby United States 20 255 0.5× 606 1.3× 461 1.7× 438 2.1× 276 1.9× 85 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Deil S. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deil S. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deil S. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deil S. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deil S. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deil S. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deil S. Wright. The network helps show where Deil S. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deil S. Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deil S. Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deil S. Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deil S. Wright. Deil S. Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wright, Deil S., et al.. (2014). DIMENSIONS OF CONTRACTING FOR SERVICE DELIVERY BY AMERICAN STATE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES: Exploring Linkages Between Intergovernmental Relations and Intersectoral Administration. Public Performance & Management Review. 4 indexed citations
2.
Wright, Deil S., Michaël Friedewald, & Raphaël Gellert. (2014). Developing and testing a surveillance impact assessment methodology. International Data Privacy Law. 5(1). 40–53. 9 indexed citations
3.
Wright, Deil S.. (2009). Intergovernmental Management for the 21st Century. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 39(4). 368–711. 21 indexed citations
4.
Miller, Cheryl M. & Deil S. Wright. (2009). Who's Minding Which Store? Institutional and Other Actors' Influence on Administrative Rulemaking in State Agencies, 1978-2004. Public Administration Quarterly. 33(3). 397. 5 indexed citations
5.
Wright, Deil S.. (2008). AMERICAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS (IGR). 한국행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집. 123–151. 1 indexed citations
6.
Wright, Deil S., et al.. (2008). Continuity and Change in Executive Leadership: Insights from the Perspectives of State Administrators. Public Administration Review. 68(s1). 6 indexed citations
7.
Bowling, Cynthia J., et al.. (2007). Effects of Administrators' Aspirations, Political Principals' Priorities, and Interest Groups' Influence on State Agency Budget Requests. Public Budgeting & Finance. 27(2). 22–49. 14 indexed citations
8.
Wright, Deil S., et al.. (2004). Contracting Out as Administrative Reform: Conceptualizing Components and Measuring Dimensions of Contracting as a Feature in the Global Transformation of Governance. 18(2). 199–231.
9.
Bowling, Cynthia J. & Deil S. Wright. (1998). Public Administration in the Fifty States: A Half-Century Administrative Revolution. State and Local Government Review. 30(1). 52–64. 5 indexed citations
10.
Edgington, David W., Jong Sup Jun, & Deil S. Wright. (1997). Globalization & Decentralization: Institutional Contexts, Policy Issues, and Intergovernmental Relations in Japan and the United States.. Pacific Affairs. 70(3). 439–439. 3 indexed citations
11.
Johansen, Pål, et al.. (1996). A contribution to overcoming the problem of residual solvents in biodegradable microspheres prepared by coacervation. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 42(1). 16–24. 57 indexed citations
13.
Wright, Deil S.. (1990). Policy Shifts in the Politics and Administration of Intergovernmental Relations, 1930s-1990s. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 509(1). 60–72. 6 indexed citations
15.
Wright, Deil S.. (1978). Understanding intergovernmental relations : public policy and participants' perspectives in local, state, and national governments. 14 indexed citations
16.
Wright, Deil S.. (1975). Revenue Sharing and Structural Features of American Federalism. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 419(1). 100–119. 4 indexed citations
17.
Wright, Deil S.. (1972). THE STATES AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS. Publius The Journal of Federalism. 1(2). 7–68. 1 indexed citations
18.
Wright, Deil S., et al.. (1971). Mayor-Manager Relationships in Large Council-Manager Cities: A Reinterpretation. Public Administration Review. 31(1). 28–28. 28 indexed citations
19.
Wright, Deil S., et al.. (1970). Revenue-Sharing: Crutch or Catalyst for State and Local Government?. The Western Political Quarterly. 23(4). 873–873. 3 indexed citations
20.
Wright, Deil S.. (1968). Federal grants-in-aid : perspectives and alternatives. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026